EGU24-10540, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-10540
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Proto-ophiolite serpentinization may influence ophiolite emplacement: Insights from numerical models 

Afonso Gomes1,2, Filipe Rosas1,2, Nicolas Riel3, João Duarte1,2, Wouter P. Schellart4, and Jaime Almeida5,6
Afonso Gomes et al.
  • 1Departamento de Geologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal (adgomes@fc.ul.pt)
  • 2Instituto Dom Luiz (IDL), Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
  • 3Institute for Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • 4Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 5Instituto Dom Luiz (IDL), Universidade da Beira Interior, Portugal
  • 6SEGAL, Departamento de Informática da Universidade da Beira Interior, Portugal

Ophiolites are exposed remnants of oceanic lithosphere that are critical to our understanding of the structure, composition, and evolution of oceanic plates.

Some ophiolites (e.g., some Tethyan-type ophiolites) originate in the oceanic forearc of an intra-oceanic subduction system (i.e., in the overriding plate). If the trailing edge of the subducting oceanic lithosphere is connected to a continental passive margin, then that passive margin may also be subducted (beneath the forearc and proto-ophiolite) once all the oceanic lithosphere is “consumed” at the trench. The subduction of the continental passive margin means that a buoyant continental crust will underthrust the oceanic forearc (i.e., proto-ophiolite). This crust goes through a burial-exhumation cycle, and as it exhumes it can drag and detach the tip of the overlaying oceanic forearc, creating an ophiolite klippe. The exhumation-emplacement process is, however, still not fully understood, particularly regarding the constraints imposed by the forearc itself. For example, the detachment of the tip of the forearc (ophiolite) from the remainder of the plate should, at least in part, be controlled by the mechanical properties of the forearc (i.e., presumably the tip of a “weak” forearc will detach more easily than the tip of a “strong” forearc).

Present-day intra-oceanic subduction forearcs (i.e., present-day model-types for Tethyan-type ophiolites) experience significant chemical alteration induced by the circulation of metamorphic fluids originating from the dehydration of the underlying subducting plate. This chemical alteration occurs mostly in the form of serpentinization of forearc peridotites, leading to a substantial weakening of the forearc lithospheric mantle. The circulation of these fluids, and hence the serpentinization process, is thought to occur primarily along preexisting deeply rooted fault systems, further weakening these strain-localizing structures, although some diffuse alteration probably also occurs. It is then reasonable to assume that the paleo forearcs that originated Tethyan-type ophiolites were also subject to these chemical and mechanical alterations, which are then expected to have affected the ophiolite emplacement process.  

Here we present novel 2D and 3D dynamic numerical models that investigate the role of forearc weakening on ophiolite emplacement processes. Specifically, we test different mechanical weakening patterns, i.e., localized (serpentinized faults) vs homogeneous (diffuse serpentinization) weakening.

Preliminary results suggest that prior serpentinization of the forearc has a critical control on ophiolite emplacement. Furthermore, differing degrees of forearc serpentinization, as well as serpentinization distribution patterns, result in different tectonic regimes of ophiolite emplacement.

 

This work was funded by the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) I.P./MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) – UIDB/50019/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/50019/2020), UIDP/50019/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/50019/2020) and LA/P/0068/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0068/2020) and through scholarship SFRH/BD/146726/2019.

How to cite: Gomes, A., Rosas, F., Riel, N., Duarte, J., P. Schellart, W., and Almeida, J.: Proto-ophiolite serpentinization may influence ophiolite emplacement: Insights from numerical models , EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-10540, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-10540, 2024.