Feedbacks between turbulent air-sea fluxes and their role in the adjustment of the Earth Climate System

In state of the art Earth System Models (ESM), the variables at the ocean-atmosphere interface (wind, air temperature, humidity, surface currents and SST) are linked to turbulent surface fluxes (momentum, sensible and latent heat) in a complex manner via bulk closures.

Understanding how turbulent fluxes interact between them and with the ocean-atmosphere interface variables is a major scientific challenge because it connects local interactions with large scale energy and water cycles.

These interactions between the different air-sea turbulent fluxes are difficult to diagnose from fully coupled ocean-atmosphere simulations due to the fact that in most modelling groups coupled and stand alone components do not necessarily use consistent forcing or representation of the air-sea fluxes. Also rigorous protocols between coupled and stand alone atmosphere and ocean simulations need to be implemented to be able to properly disentangle the role of different physical representation at the air-sea interface from global ocean-atmosphere-land adjustment feedbacks that may counteract the direct effects of air-sea fluxes modeling.

Here we use an ensemble of fully coupled and stand alone simulations using a version of the IPSL ESM [1] based on the new DYNAMICO atmospheric dynamical core [2] and the ocean engine NEMO [3]. We analyse an ensemble of experiments differing by the the bulk formulation of the air-sea turbulent fluxes (NCAR, COARE3.6, ECMWF and LMDZng). The analyses will focus on the adjustment of the system in the different cases, especially on the differences in the transport of heat and water, mixed layer depth adjustement, feedback on ocean surface properties, intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) and mid-latitude storm tracks.


[1] Boucher O., Servonnat, J., Albright, A. L., Aumont, O., Balkanski, Y., Bastrikov, V., et al. (2020). Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR climate model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2019MS002010. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002010

[2] Dubos, T., Dubey, S., Tort, M., Mittal, R., Meurdesoif, Y., and Hourdin, F.: DYNAMICO-1.0, an icosahedral hydrostatic dynamical core designed for consistency and versatility, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3131–3150, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3131-2015, 2015.
 
[3] “NEMO ocean engine”, Scientific Notes of Climate Modelling Center, 27 — ISSN 1288-1619, Institut PierreSimon Laplace (IPSL), doi:10.5281/zenodo.1464816