EGU24-11225, updated on 09 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11225
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Water management is a success story, how water quality changed based on historical development and mid-term hydroclimate.

Christian Marx1, Dörthe Tetzlaff2,3, Reinhard Hinkelmann1, and Chris Soulsby4
Christian Marx et al.
  • 1TU Berlin, Civil Engineering, Faculty VI Planning Building Environment, Berlin, Germany (c.marx@tu-berlin.de)
  • 2Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
  • 3Department of Geography, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • 4Northern Rivers Institute, University of Aberdeen

Urban water quality has traditionally been perceived as primarily influenced by point sources such as wastewater treatment plants and (combined) stormwater overflows. However, limited attention has been given to understanding how the urban stream syndrome evolves post the operation of water management facilities, the broader impacts on water quality beyond these measures, and the influence of hydroclimate on urban water quality.

In this study, we present spatially distributed data spanning 66 years of water quality and fertilizer application, 30 years of water quantity, and 20 years of groundwater quality in the urban Panke catchment, Berlin, Germany, aiming to address these questions. Hydroclimatic indicators, specifically the Standard Precipitation Index (SPI), were employed, and the data was analyzed for trend delineation, breakpoint analysis, and concentration-discharge relationships.

Predictably, major water quality changes were attributed to shifts in water management practices, such as the transformation of the former sewage irrigation farm, subsequent replacement with a wastewater treatment plant, and alterations in wastewater redirection. Interestingly, unaffected upstream sites were parallel improving in water quality. While concentration-discharge remained unaffected by hydroclimate, we observed trends towards lower NO3-N and higher NH4-N, oPO3-P, and CL concentrations during droughts. Despite these variations, the upstream sites demonstrated significant overall improvement, reaching the highest water quality classification, demonstrating how effective water management can enhance resilience.

The hydrochemical dynamics in upstream sites suggested altering connectivity during drought, which remains unclear and requires further investigation. Beyond our research findings, we highlight the importance of establishing a structured, long-term monitoring program and promoting knowledge transfer across various institutions. This collaborative approach is deemed crucial for comprehending and contextualizing the gathered data.

 

How to cite: Marx, C., Tetzlaff, D., Hinkelmann, R., and Soulsby, C.: Water management is a success story, how water quality changed based on historical development and mid-term hydroclimate., EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-11225, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11225, 2024.

Comments on the supplementary material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

supplementary materials version 1 – uploaded on 16 Apr 2024, no comments