Crustal Structure in the Central Tethys Realm
- 1Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
- 2SinoProbe Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China
- 3State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China
- 4Section of Marine Dynamics, GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany
The central Tethys realm including Anatolia, Caucasus and Iran is one of the most complex geodynamic settings within the Alpine-Himalayan belt. We calculate the depth to magnetic basement and the average crustal magnetic susceptibility, which is sensitive to the presence of iron-rich minerals, to interpret its present structure and the tecto-magmatic evolution. The data demonstrates that the structural complexity increases from the Iranian plateau into Anatolia.
In Iran, our data reveals the presence of hitherto unknown sedimentary basins and we identify two unknown parallel Magmatic-Ophiolite Arcs hidden by the sedimentary cover in eastern Iran. Based on the width of the magmatic anomalies we find that the paleo-subduction zone at the Urmia-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (Neo-Tethys subduction structure at Zagros) was steeply dipping (> 60°) in the SE and, in contrast, it had shallow dip(< 20°) in the NW part.
Our results for Anatolia demonstrate exceptional variability of crustal magnetization with smooth, small-amplitude anomalies in the Gondwana realm and short-wavelength high-amplitude variations in the Laurentia realm. Poor correlation between known ophiolites and magnetization anomalies indicates that Tethyan ophiolites are relatively poorly magnetized, which we explain by demagnetization during recent magmatism. We analyze regional magnetic characteristics for mapping previously unknown oceanic fragments and mafic intrusions, hidden beneath sedimentary sequences or overprinted by tectono-magmatic events. By the style of crustal magnetization, we distinguish three types of basins and demonstrate that many small-size basins host large volumes of magmatic rocks within or below the sedimentary cover. We map the width of magmatic arcs to estimate paleo-subduction dip angle and find no systematic variation between the Neo-Tethys and Paleo-Tethys subduction systems, while the Pontides magmatic arc has shallow (∼15°) dip in the east and steep (∼50°–55°) dip in the west. We recognize an unknown, buried 450 km-long magmatic arc along the western margin of the Kırşehir massif formed above steep (55°) subduction. We propose that lithosphere fragmentation associated with Neo-Tethys subduction systems may explain high-amplitude, high-gradient crustal magnetization in the Caucasus Large Igneous Province. Our results challenge conventional regional geological models, such as Neo-Tethyan subduction below the Greater Caucasus, and call for reevaluation of the regional paleotectonics.
References:
Teknik V., Thybo H., Artemieva I.M., Ghods A., 2020, Crustal density structure of NW Iranian Plateau. Tectonophysics, 792, 228588, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228588.
Teknik, V., Artemieva, I. M., & Thybo, H. 2023. Geodynamics of the central Tethyan belt revisited: Inferences from crustal magnetization in the Anatolia-Caucasus-Black Sea region. Tectonics, 42, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022TC007282.
How to cite: Teknik, V., Thybo, H., and Artemieva, I.: Crustal Structure in the Central Tethys Realm, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-11578, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11578, 2024.