EGU24-11696, updated on 09 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11696
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Distinguishing between cloud and aerosol layers in the TROPOMI/Sentinel-5P measurements

Athina Argyrouli1,2, Ronny Lutz2, Fabian Romahn2, Víctor Molina García2, Luca Lelli2,3, Diego Loyola2, Omar Torres4, Eleni Marinou5, and Vassilis Amiridis5
Athina Argyrouli et al.
  • 1Technical University of Munich, School of Engineering and Design, Chair of Remote Sensing Technology, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 Munich, Germany (athina.argyrouli@dlr.de)
  • 2German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote Sensing Technology Institute, Oberpfaffenhofen, Münchener Str. 20, 82234 Weßling, Germany
  • 3Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing, University of Bremen, Germany
  • 4NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA
  • 5IAASARS, National Observatory of Athens, Athens, Greece

TROPOMI on board of Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) provides continuous daily distribution of several cloud properties, which are required as input for trace-gas retrievals. The operational TROPOMI cloud retrieval is a two-step algorithm. At first, the OCRA (Optical Cloud Recognition Algorithm) computes a radiometric cloud fraction using a broad-band UV/VIS color space approach and later the ROCINN (Retrieval of Cloud Information using Neural Networks) retrieves the cloud height, cloud optical thickness and cloud albedo from NIR measurements in and around the oxygen A-band (~760nm). Within the ROCINN algorithm two different models are possible; the Clouds-as-Reflecting-Boundaries (CRB), where the cloud is a simple Lambertian reflector and the Clouds-as-Layers (CAL), where the cloud is a homogeneous layer of scattering liquid-water spherical particles. There is evidence that some TROPOMI cloud retrievals are contaminated by aerosols. This is particularly true in the following cases: (a) when there is co-existence of clouds and aerosols in the same TROPOMI footprint and (b) when there is a pure aerosol layer, appearing in the TROPOMI cloud product. The latter is usually the case of OCRA deriving an elevated radiometric cloud fraction corresponding to the given aerosol conditions. Then, ROCINN is triggered and returns two additional cloud parameters. Often, the false alarms of elevated OCRA cloud fraction can be identified when ROCINN retrieves a cloud height at the surface level. However, there are cases in which ROCINN cloud outputs do not refer to the surface properties of the scene, but to aerosol layers present in the same TROPOMI footprint. Especially for dust aerosols, which are usually large particles and comparable to the cloud droplet size, we expect more frequently those mixed retrievals. In particular, dust layers with large concentrations (i.e., high aerosol optical depth (AOD)) are better candidates for erroneously retrieved clouds in the TROPOMI L2 product. The TROPOMI aerosol algorithm (TropOMAER) makes use of the L1b reflectances in the UV to derive aerosol information in cloud-free and above-cloud aerosol scenes. With the use of ground-based active and passive remote sensing instruments, we are able to characterize well the vertically resolved cloud and aerosol layers in the lower troposphere. In this work, synergistic ground-based measurements from a PollyXT multiwavelength-Raman-polarization lidar and an AERONET sun-photometer are used to discriminate dust aerosols from clouds in TROPOMI measurements. We have selected ground-based observation sites over which the atmospheric column frequently contains large contributions of desert dust particles.

How to cite: Argyrouli, A., Lutz, R., Romahn, F., Molina García, V., Lelli, L., Loyola, D., Torres, O., Marinou, E., and Amiridis, V.: Distinguishing between cloud and aerosol layers in the TROPOMI/Sentinel-5P measurements, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-11696, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-11696, 2024.