Appropriate Thermal Modelling Approaches for Interpreting Topographic and Tectonic Change from Thermochronometer Data (Remembering the Geotherm and 200 years of Lord Kelvin’s legacy)

Quantifying rates and magnitudes of topographic change across timescales requires diverse observational and modeling techniques.  Low-temperature thermochronometer methods are a powerful tool for quantifying denudation rates, paleotopography, and/or the kinematic history of orogens over geologic timescales.  Parallel to thermochronometer technique development, a range of thermal, kinematic, and erosion modeling approaches are available to interpret tectonic and surface processes from thermochronometer data. However, differing thermal modelling approaches exist in the literature and often lead to the question of which approach is most appropriate, and when?

This presentation addresses the diversity of thermo-kinematic and erosion modelling approaches available to quantitatively interpret topographic change or tectonic processes from thermochronometer data. Emphasis is placed on deciphering the different approaches available and which approach is suitable for the scientific questions asked (e.g., topographic change, tectonic/faulting history, etc.) in diverse geologic settings.  Thermo-physical factors explored include the appropriate model spatial dimension (e.g., 1D, 2D, vs. 3D); the influence of model geometry on geotherms; the importance of constant basal temperature vs. flux basal boundary conditions; transient vs. steady-state geotherms, and how tradeoffs in different parameters (exhumation rate, material properties, boundary conditions) can produce similar thermochronometer ages. The presentation focuses on examples from the literature, ranging from William Thompson’s (Lord Kelvin) founding work on continental geotherms to contemporary numerical modeling approaches.