EGU24-13985, updated on 09 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-13985
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

What do we learn about regional and global methane budgets using stable methane isotope measurements in a global inverse model?

Lori Bruhwiler1 and Youmi Oh2
Lori Bruhwiler and Youmi Oh
  • 1NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory, Boulder CO, United States of America (lori.bruhwiler@noaa.gov)
  • 2Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States of America

Observations indicate accelerating growth of atmospheric CH4, creating a challenge for meeting the Global Methane Pledge that aims to achieve 30% cuts in global emissions by 2030. A recent UNEP report proposes that feasible CH4 emission cuts could result in a 45% reduction in anthropogenic emissions, avoiding 0.3 ºC of warming by mid-century while having a positive impact on human health through air quality improvements. However, given that the most feasible methane emissions reductions are in the oil and gas sector, it will be difficult to achieve the goals of the Global Methane Pledge with current signatories without also considering emissions from agriculture and waste. It is therefore important to be able to quantify and monitor anthropogenic and natural microbial emissions.

Measurements of the 13C stable isotope of CH4 could be useful for partitioning emissions between fossil fuel and microbial sources, and global analyses imply that recent increases in atmospheric growth are dominated by microbial sources. Atmospheric observations of methane and 13CH4 were used to constrain the NOAA CarbonTracker-CH4 inversion modeling system. Results show that the largest share of recent growth in CH4 is due to increasing microbial and fossil fuel emissions in the developing economies of Asia. A smaller contribution to the recent growth in atmospheric CH4 is also from increasing microbial emissions in tropical South America and Africa, possibly a combination of emissions from natural wetlands and agriculture. At global scale there is little change in fossil fuel emissions, however this result is highly dependent in how stable isotope measurements are used in the inversion. In this presentation we highlight uncertainties associated with using isotope measurements and how they affect our understanding of the atmospheric methane budget.

How to cite: Bruhwiler, L. and Oh, Y.: What do we learn about regional and global methane budgets using stable methane isotope measurements in a global inverse model?, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-13985, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-13985, 2024.