EGU24-1501, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1501
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

An elucidation on the distribution of arsenic safe aquifers: Introspection from the Gangetic basin

Tridip Bhowmik1, Oindrila Bose2, Kanhaiya Kumar3, Ankit Dipta Dutta2, Maya Jha4, Nupur Bose4, Ashok Ghosh3, Chander Kumar Singh5, Probal Sengupta2, and Abhijit Mukherjee1,2
Tridip Bhowmik et al.
  • 1School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
  • 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
  • 3Mahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Center, Patna-801505, Bihar, India
  • 4Department of Geography, A.N. College, Patna-800013, India
  • 5Department Natural and Applied Sciences, TERI School of Advanced Studies, New Delhi, 110070, India

The obscurity in the distribution of arsenic safe aquifers poses critical challenges in devising mitigation strategies. This study attempts to bridge this knowledge gap by providing insights on the distribution of redox distinct sediments, hydrogeochemical characteristics and the plausible controls that govern As distribution in the safe and unsafe aquifers. In this study, a total of 75 drillings have been conducted in 3 study sites (2 in West Bengal and 1 in Bihar, India) across ~25 km2 of area in each of the sites. The results revealed that in the case of North 24 Parganas (NP) in West Bengal, a continuous layer of brown-colored sand was observed at a depth between 40 and 60 m overlain by a grey-colored sand layer, whereas in the case of Nadia (ND) in West Bengal and Bhagalpur (BHG) in Bihar, the grey-colored sand layer was prominent. The brown-colored/brownish-grey-colored sand layer was fragmentary in both ND and BHG, with small lenses found in some parts of the study area. In the case of NP, the brown sand layer was protected by an aquitard layer. Groundwater chemical analysis revealed that the majority of the grey sand aquifers in both NP and ND yielded water with a high As concentration, while >80% of the wells installed in the brown sand layers exhibited a low As concentration (<10 µg/L). However, in the case of BHG, only 56% of the wells installed in brown or brownish-grey sand were As safe. Besides, 32% of the water samples from grey sand aquifers exhibited As safe concentrations in BHG, among which most of them had high Cl/Br, SO4, and NO3 concentrations. This states that the ingression of surficial contaminants may have suppressed the release of As concentrations due to the availability of other potential terminal electron acceptors at the BHG study site. Overall, the continuous brown sand layer observed in NP study site can be utilized as a suitable drinking water source however the intermittent layers as observed in ND and BHG study site may not serve as a potent source in terms of safe drinking water supply.

How to cite: Bhowmik, T., Bose, O., Kumar, K., Dutta, A. D., Jha, M., Bose, N., Ghosh, A., Singh, C. K., Sengupta, P., and Mukherjee, A.: An elucidation on the distribution of arsenic safe aquifers: Introspection from the Gangetic basin, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-1501, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1501, 2024.