EGU24-16157, updated on 18 Apr 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-16157
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Enhancing Renewable Energy Forecasting: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Weather Forecast Models and Post-Processing Methods for Belgium

Ruoke Meng1, Aaron Van Poecke2, Geert Smet1, Jonathan Demaeyer3, Hossein Tabari1,2,4, Peter Hellinckx2, Joris Van den Bergh1, and Piet Termonia1,5
Ruoke Meng et al.
  • 1Department of Meteorological and Climatological Research, Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
  • 2Modeling for Sustainability (M4S), Department of Electronics & ICT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
  • 3Department of Meteorological and Climatological Services, Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
  • 4United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

As renewable energy sources continue to account for an increasing proportion of Belgium's energy production, decision making in renewable energy production increasingly relies on accurate numerical weather prediction forecasts. For general applications, forecast validation often focuses on direct comparisons to observations for the whole domains of interest, while in this study we assess model performance specifically related to renewable energy productions. We perform extended verification of relevant variables (wind speed, temperature, solar radiation, etc.) from multiple high-resolution deterministic and ensemble weather forecast models operated in Belgium for the period of May 2021 - June 2023. The forecasts are verified with observational datasets collected from on- and offshore weather stations, masts, lidars, and wind farm observations to comprehensively understand the capabilities of the models, making use of various deterministic and probabilistic skill scores. The results show that during lead times up to two days, although verification metrics differ among models, there are systematic errors in their forecasts for different observation sites. Such errors can often be eliminated by post-processing techniques. Therefore, we extend our verification dataset, with post-processed forecasts corrected by several methods including member-by-member and AI-based approaches. The results of this work will lead to an enhanced understanding of current forecasting skills of the operational models, help to evaluate the effectiveness of goal-oriented post-processing methods, and provide a reference for Belgian sustainable energy stakeholders.

How to cite: Meng, R., Van Poecke, A., Smet, G., Demaeyer, J., Tabari, H., Hellinckx, P., Van den Bergh, J., and Termonia, P.: Enhancing Renewable Energy Forecasting: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Weather Forecast Models and Post-Processing Methods for Belgium, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-16157, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-16157, 2024.