A Fresh Start for Flood Estimation in Ungauged Catchments

Flood estimation in ungauged basins is important for flood design, and for improving our understanding of the sensitivity of flood magnitude to changes in climate and land cover. Flood estimates in ungauged basins by current methods (e.g. statistical regression, unit hydrograph) have high uncertainty, even in places with dense observing networks (e.g. +/- 50-100% in the UK). Reductions in this uncertainty are being sought by using alternative methods, such as continuous simulation using hydrological models (spatially-distributed or lumped), and event-scale derived distribution approaches. The very significant challenges for reliable application of continuous simulation models in ungauged catchments are well known. So far there has been only limited application of machine learning techniques to this problem, but it seems an obvious route to try, but to exploit the big-data strengths of this approach, the problem must be recast to extract information from many more events at each site than just annual maximum events.

The event-scale derived distribution approach also has challenges, which we explore below. The derived distribution approach at the event scale typically combines the following elements: a stochastic rainfall model, an event-scale rainfall-runoff model (including “losses” and a “baseflow” component), and a runoff routing model. In principle, every element of this approach may be considered as a (seasonally varying) random variable. The flood peak distribution is obtained by integrating over joint distributions of the model elements. After giving an overview of our approach, I will focus on challenges regarding the catchment response time associated with flood events.

How should we define catchment response time? Why do we need this quantity and how will it be used? What are the relative merits of empirical and model/theory-based approaches? Specifically, I will discuss the empirical DMCA method for catchment response time of Giani et al, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr028201). How is it relevant for ungauged catchments? What does DMCA really measure? How do we assign hydrological meaning to this empirical response time? How does this response time vary between events and catchments?