EGU24-16943, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-16943
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

High-temperature CO2 mineralisation in basaltic rocks: Inconsistencies between laboratory experiments and numerical modelling 

Maximilian Berndsen1,2, Selçuk Erol3, Taylan Akın4, Serhat Akın5, Isabella Nardini1, Adrian Immenhauser1,2, and Mathias Nehler1
Maximilian Berndsen et al.
  • 1Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geothermal Systems IEG, Am Hochschulcampus 1/IEG, 44801 Bochum, Germany
  • 2Institute of Geology, Mineralogy, and Geophysics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
  • 3Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Izmir Institute of Technology (IZTECH), 35430- Urla-Izmir/Turkey
  • 4Geothermal Application and Research Center, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
  • 5Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University (METU), ODTÜ Üniversiteler Mah.Dumlupınar Blv.No:1, 06800 Çankaya Ankara, Turkey

The Nesjavellir high temperature geothermal reservoir, located in southwest Iceland, was one of the test sites for the 'Geothermal Emission Control' (GECO) project. The project involves the reinjection of exhaust gases from geothermal power plants into the subsurface for permanent storage. Numerical modelling and field data from the nearby CarbFix2 storage site at Hellisheiði indicate that even at high temperatures (< 280°C), large quantities of CO2 can be mineralised. To complement these data, we investigated the potential for CO2 sequestration in the Nesjavellir reservoir by conducting a 260 °C batch reaction experiment using a basaltic drill core sample and effluent water from the Nesjavellir injection well. We also simulated the experiment using the PHREEQC geochemical modelling program and observed significant inconsistencies between the modelled and experimental results. The experiment produced a secondary mineral assemblage dominated by zeolites, chlorites and anhydrite, with no carbonates observed. In contrast, the model predicted the formation of calcite, which did not occur during the experiment. This discrepancy is due to the model's inability to handle solid solutions and non-ideal phases adequately. During the experiment, Ca was primarily incorporated into anhydrite and a Na-Ca-zeolite, which resembles a solid solution of wairakite and analcime. However, the model did not consider this phase, which resulted in Ca being incorporated into calcite instead of zeolite.

The experimental results are consistent with previous studies that show limited carbon mineralization at higher temperatures (> 180 °C) due to the competition between carbonates and silicates for the uptake of divalent cations. In addition, a comparison with the numerical model shows that simulations of high-temperature CO2 sequestration can be misleading as they may not be able to reproduce the complexity of non-ideal silicate mineral formation, resulting in an overestimation of carbonate formation.

How to cite: Berndsen, M., Erol, S., Akın, T., Akın, S., Nardini, I., Immenhauser, A., and Nehler, M.: High-temperature CO2 mineralisation in basaltic rocks: Inconsistencies between laboratory experiments and numerical modelling , EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-16943, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-16943, 2024.