EGU24-18491, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-18491
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Improving Consistency in Methane Emission Quantification from the Natural Gas Distribution System across Measurement Devices

Judith Tettenborn1, Daniel Zavala-Araiza1,2, Daan Stroeken1, Hossein Maazallahi1, Arjan Hensen3, Ilona Velzeboer3, Pim van den Bulk3, Felix Vogel4, Lawson Gillespie4,5, Sebastien Ars4, James France6,7, and Thomas Röckmann1
Judith Tettenborn et al.
  • 1Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Atmospheric Physics and Chemistry, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • 2Environmental Defense Fund, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Environmental Modelling, Sensing & Analysis, TNO, Petten, Netherlands
  • 4Climate Chemistry Measurements and Research, Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Canada
  • 5Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • 6Department of Earth Sciences, Centre of Climate, Ocean and Atmosphere, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom
  • 7Environmental Defense Fund, London, United Kingdom

Efficient and cost-effective mitigation of methane emissions from local gas distribution systems requires full characterization of leaks across an urban region. Mobile real-time measurements of ambient CH4 provide a fast and effective approach to identify and quantify methane leaks. The objective of such methodologies is to relate emission rates to parameters obtained during mobile measurements. These parameters encompass the maximum methane enhancement detected while crossing a methane plume and the integrated area of the associated peak. The maximum enhancement is currently used for emission quantification in mobile measurements, but was suggested to exhibit inconsistency among various measurement devices. Based on controlled release experiments conducted in four cities (London, Toronto, Rotterdam, and Utrecht), emission estimation methodologies were evaluated. Integrated plume area was found to be a more robust metric across different methane gas analyzer devices than the maximum methane enhancement. A statistical function based on integrated plume area is proposed for more consistent emission estimations when using different instruments. Nevertheless, large temporal variations in CH4 concentration enhancements were observed for the same release rate in line with previous experiments. Evaluation of repeated measurements to address this uncertainty and enable differentiation among various leak sizes was included. This study recommends a minimum of three repeated measurements and an optimal range of 5-7 plume transects for effective emission quantification to prioritize repair actions.

How to cite: Tettenborn, J., Zavala-Araiza, D., Stroeken, D., Maazallahi, H., Hensen, A., Velzeboer, I., van den Bulk, P., Vogel, F., Gillespie, L., Ars, S., France, J., and Röckmann, T.: Improving Consistency in Methane Emission Quantification from the Natural Gas Distribution System across Measurement Devices, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-18491, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-18491, 2024.