EGU24-19235, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19235
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Is impact ripple flattening caused by aeolian shear melting of the granular bed?

Constantin Rein1, Lior Saban2, Hezi Yizhaq3, Klaus Kroy1, Itzhak Katra2, and Katharina Tholen1
Constantin Rein et al.
  • 1Leipzig University, Institute for theoretical Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth System Sciences, Germany
  • 2Department of Environmental, Geoinformatics and Urban Planning Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
  • 3Department of Solar Energy and Environmental Physics, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel

Ripples are common aeolian sand waves that can broadly be classified into megaripples, impact ripples and a newly proposed aerodynamic ripple type [1]. Grain scale numerical simulations and conventional theories associate impact ripple formation with a characteristic hop length for the grain trajectories over a quasi-static bed [2-5]. Based on original and literature data we show that impact ripple patterns vanish structurally with increasing shear stress not far from the transport threshold. We correlate the experiments with recent observations of the mass-flux scaling as a function of the shear stress and accompanying grain-scale transport models [6,7]. The comparison suggests that impact ripple vanishing may be associated with a crossover between two fundamentally different transport modes. Only at low wind speeds, near the transport threshold, a description in terms of grain hopping on a quasi-static dilatant sand bed applies, consistent with impact ripple formation. Under stronger winds, the bed-air interface becomes increasingly blurred, due to the formation of a collision-dominated fluidized transport layer that fails to support quasi-static short-wavelength ripples but remains susceptible to longer-wavelength hydrodynamic instabilities. Our observations and tentative physical explanations may contribute to a better understanding of impact ripple formation and provide a new criterion to discriminate between impact ripples and other, more stable ripple types.

[1] Yizhaq, H., Tholen, K., Saban, L. et al. Coevolving aerodynamic and impact ripples on Earth. Nat. Geosci. (2024).
[2] Bagnold, R. A. The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes (Methuen, 1941).
[3] Sharp, R. P. Wind ripples. J. Geol. 71, 617–636 (1963).
[4] Anderson, R. S. A theoretical model for aeolian impact ripples. Sedimentology 34, 943–956 (1987).
[5] Durán, O., Claudin, P. & Andreotti, B. Direct numerical simulations of aeolian sand ripples. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15665–15668 (2014).
[6] Pähtz, T. & Durán, O. Scaling laws for planetary sediment transport from dem-rans numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 963, A20 (2023).
[7] Tholen, K., Pähtz, T., Kamath, S., Parteli, E. J. R. & Kroy, K. Anomalous scaling of aeolian sand transport reveals coupling to bed rheology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 058204 (2023).

How to cite: Rein, C., Saban, L., Yizhaq, H., Kroy, K., Katra, I., and Tholen, K.: Is impact ripple flattening caused by aeolian shear melting of the granular bed?, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-19235, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19235, 2024.