EGU24-19378, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19378
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Integrated GIS analysis for flood risk assessment in Norwegian Rivers: a case study of Sokna river

Adina Moraru, Raffa Ahmed, Mulubirhan G. Tekle, Knut Alfredsen, and Oddbjørn Bruland
Adina Moraru et al.
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Hydraulic Engineering research group, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Trondheim, Norway (adina.moraru@ntnu.no)

This research aims to simplify and enhance the analysis and visualization of flood-prone areas in Norwegian rivers, with a primary emphasis on Sokna river. Utilizing remote sensing and GIS analysis, our objective is to advance flood risk assessment and management by integrating hydraulic data from numerical models, remotely sensed geomorphic features, and publicly available natural hazard maps. In this study, we develop GIS models, analyze geomorphic features related to erosion and deposition processes, and optimize flood risk analysis using hydro-morphodynamic indicators such as shear stress, stream power, Froude number, Shields formula, and the Hjulström diagram.

To locate flood-prone areas and estimate their severity, different influencing factors to flood risk were identified, among them fluvial dynamics, terrain characteristics, land use, and anthropic activities. Within the 12.65 km lowermost reach of Sokna river, near its confluence with Gaula river and Lundamo urban area, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the geomorphological features (e.g. river width, soil type), natural hazards maps, and anthropic footprint (i.e. land use, infrastructure, safety measures), supported by hydrodynamics information from HEC-RAS models. Special attention was given to the analysis of sediments, erodible materials, and land use along the riverbanks while integrating flood areas with return periods ranging from 10 to 500 years, as well as other natural hazards such as rockfall- and snow erosion and deposition areas, avalanche records, landslides, debris, and quick clay landslide areas.

A temporal analysis was conducted using orthophotos from 1956, 2011, and 2021. The river channels in these orthophotos, captured in the same month to ensure similar discharges, were digitized to assess changes in river width and deposition processes. Additionally, DEM of Differences (DoD) supported refining documented river changes. The erodible sediment particle size was estimated using the Shields formula based on HEC-RAS model outputs, including Froude number, shear stress, and stream power. The erodible fraction was plotted into Shields and Hjulström diagrams and compared with the soil map. Identified locations with erodible material were complemented with land use data and other anthropic activities. Vulnerable infrastructure to erosion and deposition processes, such as culverts and bridges, were considered in flood risk assessments, with areas having safety measures (such as channel embankments) marked as having lower flood risk.

The step-by-step workflow, integrated into a GIS model using the Model Builder feature in ArcGIS Pro, is replicable for other rivers. These findings provide insights into the factors influencing flood risk, including potential erosion areas, the impact of natural hazards, and the temporal evolution of river channels. This methodology serves as a versatile tool for flood risk assessment and management in other river systems, contributing to the broader field of fluvial geomorphology and hydraulic engineering.

How to cite: Moraru, A., Ahmed, R., Tekle, M. G., Alfredsen, K., and Bruland, O.: Integrated GIS analysis for flood risk assessment in Norwegian Rivers: a case study of Sokna river, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-19378, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19378, 2024.