EGU24-19683, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19683
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Four roles for geoscientists in climate litigation

Wim Thiery1, Rosa Pietroiusti1, Annalisa Savaresi2,3, and Stefaan Smis4
Wim Thiery et al.
  • 1Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Brussels, Belgium (wim.thiery@vub.be)
  • 2University of Eastern Finland, Law School, Faculty of Social Sciences and Business Studies, Finland
  • 3University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
  • 4Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Departments of International and European Law, Brussels, Belgium

The number of climate change lawsuits is exploding,  and so is the need for scientific evidence on climate change in courtrooms. Here we identify four roles that climate researchers can take up in light of these recent developments: expert witness, party support, amicus curiae, and litigation-relevant research. For each role, we highlight recent examples and best practices, as well as pitfalls and their overcoming. These examples overall highlight the urgent need for interdisciplinary research between climate science and legal scholars to bring both research communities closer together. In addition, and in activities where exchange with litigators takes place, it is critical that ingestion of scientific information occurs right from the start of the litigation process.

How to cite: Thiery, W., Pietroiusti, R., Savaresi, A., and Smis, S.: Four roles for geoscientists in climate litigation, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-19683, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19683, 2024.