Counterfactual floods: What if the storm track would have taken a different path?

When a flood disaster occurs, there is an opportunity for affected individuals and decision-makers to learn from the experience. However, this learning tends to be narrowly focused on the specific event, missing the chance to discuss and prepare for even more severe or different events. For instance, regions that have been spared from havoc might feel safe and underestimate the risk. We suggest spatial counterfactual floods to encourage society to engage in discussions about exceptional events and appropriate risk management strategies. We create a series of floods across Germany by spatially shifting the rainfall fields of the 10 most expensive floods, arguing that past storm tracks could have occurred several tens of kilometers away from their actual paths. The set of spatial counterfactual floods generated includes events that are more than twice as severe as the most devastating flood in Germany since 1950. Our approach obtains peak flows that exceed the current flood-of-record at more than 70% of the gauges (369 out of 516). Spatial counterfactuals are proposed as an easy-to-understand approach to overcome society's unwillingness to consider and prepare for exceptional floods, which are expected to occur more frequently in a warmer world.