EGU24-21086, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-21086
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

S.A.N.D.S. - Surface Archaeology on the Namib Desert Surface. 

Abi Stone1, Dominic Stratford2,3, Ted Marks4, Rachel Bynoe5, Kaarina Efraim6, Eugene Marais7, Rachel Smedley8, and George Leader9,10,2
Abi Stone et al.
  • 1Department of Geography, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (abi.stone@manchester.ac.uk)
  • 2Archaeology Department, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
  • 3State University of New York at Stony Brook, U.S.A.
  • 4New Orleans Center for Creative Arts, New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A
  • 5Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Avenue Campus, Southampton, UK
  • 6National Museum of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
  • 7Gobabeb Namib Research Station, Gobabeb, Namibia
  • 8Liverpool Luminescence Laboratory, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK
  • 9Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey, U.S.A.
  • 10Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, U.S.A.

The hyper-arid Namib Sand Sea (NSS) represents a significant challenge to human occupation, yet, despite these challenges, Early Stone Age (ESA) and Middle Stone Age (MSA) tools are found across this landscape. Whilst surface scatters are hindered by a lack of clear stratigraphy, they provide a spatially integrated record of the structuring of landscape use through time and relationships to sources of raw material and water. Omitting such sites leads to bias in our interpretations of early hominin distribution. We are investigating how and why early hominins were moving into the northern NSS, starting with two interdune pan sites: Namib IV (Leader et al., 2023) and Narabeb. Here we set out the context of these archaeological sites, the stratigraphies observed and our emerging luminescence chronologies for the sedimentary sequences.

 

To establish the palaeoenvironmental context of the lithics (both ESA and MSA) and fossil fauna at Namib IV we dug a series of test pits to explore the sedimentological record. The Namib IV surface has a complex meso-topography with a spatially-patchy, resistant calcareous surface unit, and our test pits reveal a similarly complex sedimentary record across space. This includes the preserved remnant of an aeolian slip face, and elsewhere a number of horizontally bedded units beneath surface calcareous layers. 13 samples from Namib IV were selected for luminescence dating, using pIRIRSL feldspar methods, anticipating ages close to quartz saturation (e.g. Stone et al. (2010) in this region). Narabeb contains predominantly MSA lithics. North (~2 km) of the artifact collection area is a prominent ‘ledge’ of interbedded muds and sands, previously dated using quartz OSL (Stone et al., 2010). We dug two small geotrenches associated with surface calcareous exposures, taking samples for pIRIRSL dating along with two sampling points in the lower unconsolidated dune flank. We also date a sample from the Stone et al. (2010) sequence using pIRIRSL (K fieldspar) to revise the saturated quartz luminescence age estimate.

 

References

Leader, G.M., Bynoe, R., Marks, T., Stone, A., Efraim, K., Stratford, D., Marais, E. (2023) Revisiting the Acheulean at Namib IV in the Namib Desert, Namibia. Journal of Field Archaeology 48(5), 380-394.

Stone, A., Thomas, D.S.G., Viles, H.A. (2010) Late Quaternary palaeohydrological changes in the northern Namib Sand Sea: new chronologies using OSL dating of interdigitated aeolian and water-lain interdune deposits. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 288 (1-4), 35-53.

How to cite: Stone, A., Stratford, D., Marks, T., Bynoe, R., Efraim, K., Marais, E., Smedley, R., and Leader, G.: S.A.N.D.S. - Surface Archaeology on the Namib Desert Surface. , EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-21086, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-21086, 2024.

Comments on the supplementary material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

supplementary materials version 1 – uploaded on 08 Apr 2024, no comments