EGU24-21240, updated on 11 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-21240
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Anisotropy and XKS-splitting from geodynamic models of double subduction: Testing the limits of interpretation

Jan Philipp Kruse1, Georg Rümpker1,2, Frederik Link1,3, Thibault Duretz1, and Harro Schmeling1
Jan Philipp Kruse et al.
  • 1Institute of Geosciences, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 2Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, United States

We utilize three-dimensional geodynamic models to predict XKS-splitting in double subduction scenarios characterized by two outward-dipping slabs. These models are highly applicable in various realistic settings, such as the central Mediterranean. Our primary focus is on the analysis of XKS-splitting, a key geophysical observable used for inferring seismic anisotropy and mantle flow patterns.Our models simulate the concurrent subduction of two identical oceanic plates separated by a continental plate. The variation in the strength of the separating plate causes a transition from a retreating to a stationary trench. The models offer detailed insights into the temporal evolution of mantle flow patterns, particularly the amount of trench-parallel flow induced by this specific type of subduction.In the subsequent step, we employ the well-known D-Rex model to estimate Crystallographic Preferred Orientation (CPO) development in response to plastic deformation resulting from mantle flow. Based on the D-Rex model results, which incorporate the full elastic tensor of a deformed multiphase polycrystalline mantle aggregate, we derive synthetic apparent splitting parameters and splitting intensities at virtual receivers placed at the surface using multiple-layer anisotropic waveform modeling. To identify regions with pronounced depth-dependent variations of anisotropic properties, particularly the fast polarization directions, we define a complex anisotropy factor dependent on the apparent splitting parameters and splitting intensities.Finally, using the apparent splitting parameters, we conduct two-layer model inversions at selected locations characterized by a large complex anisotropy factor. The two-layer model provides apparent splitting parameters as a result of analytical waveform modeling for two anisotropic layers. We observe that while several models can effectively explain the apparent splitting parameters, only a subset can accurately reproduce the depth-dependent anisotropic properties. Our findings unequivocally demonstrate that a classical XKS-splitting analysis can effectively identify areas characterized by complex anisotropy and provide accurate approximations of the depth-dependent variations of anisotropic properties within these regions. However, caution is warranted when interpreting results obtained through inversion based on a two-layer analysis.

How to cite: Kruse, J. P., Rümpker, G., Link, F., Duretz, T., and Schmeling, H.: Anisotropy and XKS-splitting from geodynamic models of double subduction: Testing the limits of interpretation, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-21240, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-21240, 2024.