Co-production could improve the science-policy-practice nexus in hydrology: lessons from co-producing knowledge on flood risk in Tamale, Ghana

Understanding of hydrological risk is increasing but much of it remains non-actionable. Consequently, interventions are seldom informed by the latest insights, limiting their effectiveness and resilience, especially in a non-stationary world. The co-production of knowledge in hydrology can result in more salient, useful, and usable outcomes that are used to directly inform decisions. Co-production is an interactive and complex process founded on relationships between science, society, practice, and policy. We are applying this approach to generate locally relevant understanding, evidence, and action on flood risk in Tamale, a city of ~500,000 people in northern Ghana. A team of citizens, practitioners, policy makers, and researchers from a range of disciplines are working together to understand the drivers and distribution of flood risk, as well as the effects of top-down and citizen-led adaptation. Knowledge is generated and validated in a series of stages and cycles and operationalized in different modes for different users. Whilst this is an ongoing process which continues to evolve, in this talk I will share lessons and experiences from the co-production approach in Tamale that may be translatable to other contexts. Co-production approaches represent tangible frameworks to improve the science-policy-practice nexus in hydrology and water resources management, and sharing good examples can expedite adoption.