EGU24-3356, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3356
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Effects of watershed subdivision based on soil and land use inputs on SWAT performance in a coastal Mediterranean catchment

Mathilde Puche1,2, Magali Troin1,2, Dennis Fox1, and Paul Royer-Gaspard1,2
Mathilde Puche et al.
  • 1UMR CNRS ESPACE, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France (mathilde.puche@etu.univ-cotedazur.fr)
  • 2Hydroclimat, Toulon, France

Assessing the benefits of increasing the discretization level of semi-distributed hydrological models is of great importance for hydrological applications. The impact of spatial discretization on model performance is investigated with the use of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model when applied on a Mediterranean watershed (Argens, France). This study aims to explore how the spatial discretization (number of sub-basins and of hydrological response units (HRUs)) affects the model’s performance at simulating daily streamflows, and if the choice of soil and land use input datasets modifies model accuracy. Low and moderate resolution soil (5 km and 250 m) and land use (400 m and 100 m) maps are considered. Four SWAT input sets are created, each corresponding to a different combination of land use and soil datasets. Each input set is used to build 17 configurations with an increasing number of sub-basins (4, 12, and 18) and HRUs (from 4 to 320). The 68 models (4 input sets x 17 configurations) are evaluated on the 2001-2021 period using the Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) metric. Results indicate no influence of the number of sub-basins on SWAT performance. However, increasing the number of HRUs leads to a significant performance decrease (from 0.13 to 0.26 of KGE loss), regardless of the number of sub-basins and input datasets. The SWAT model is found to be more sensitive to soil dataset than to land use dataset. Despite significant differences in hydrological soil groups between the two soil maps, no clear impact on the derived hydrological properties is observed, such as the curve number. The observed decline in SWAT performance with an increasing number of HRUs is attributed to the calibration process rather than the soil and land use input datasets. This study suggests that, when the calibration of the semi-distributed SWAT model is not performed at the finer spatial HRU level, an increase in the spatial discretization does not lead to an improvement of the overall model accuracy.  Therefore, minimizing the number of HRUs during the watershed subdivision is recommended for getting optimal simulations of streamflow while dealing with the computational efficiency of SWAT.

How to cite: Puche, M., Troin, M., Fox, D., and Royer-Gaspard, P.: Effects of watershed subdivision based on soil and land use inputs on SWAT performance in a coastal Mediterranean catchment, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-3356, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3356, 2024.