EGU24-3399, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3399
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Enhancing debris flow warning through seismic feature selection and machine learning model comparison

Qi Zhou1,2, Jens turowski1, Hui Tang1, Clément Hibert3, Małgorzata Chmiel4, Fabian Walter5, and Michael Dietze1,6
Qi Zhou et al.
  • 1GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Earth Surface Process Modelling, Germany
  • 2Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
  • 3Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg / ITES, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • 4Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de La Côte d’Azur, CNRS, IRD, Géoazur, Valbonne, France
  • 5Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 6Faculty of Geoscience and Geography, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

Machine learning can improve the accuracy of detecting mass movements in seismic signals and extend early warning times. However, we lack a profound understanding of the limitations of different machine learning methods and the most effective seismic features especially for the identifcation of debris flows. This contribution explores the importance of seismic features with Random Forest and XGBoost models. We find that a widely used approach based on more than seventy seismic features, including waveform, spectrum, spectrogram, and network metrics features, suffers from redundant input information. Our results show that six seismic features are sufficient to perform binary debris flow classification with equivalent or even better results., e.g., the Random Forest and XGBoost models achieve improvements over the benchmark of 0.09% and 1.10%, respectively, when validated on the ILL12 station. Considering models that aim to capture patterns in sequential data rather than information in the current time window, using the Long Short-Term Memory algorithm does not improve the binary classification performance over Random Forest and XGBoost models. However, in the early warning context, the Long Short-Term Memory model performs better and more consistently detects the initiation of debris flows. Our proposed framework simplifies seismic signal-driven early warning for debris flows and provides a proper workflow that can be used for detecting also other mass movements.

How to cite: Zhou, Q., turowski, J., Tang, H., Hibert, C., Chmiel, M., Walter, F., and Dietze, M.: Enhancing debris flow warning through seismic feature selection and machine learning model comparison, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-3399, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3399, 2024.