The distinct hydrological responses to vegetation restoration between planted and natural forests watersheds

Vegetation restoration such as human-induced and natural growth has seen a significant increase over the past two decades. However, this surge has raised concerns regarding its potential impact on water resources and its consequential hindrance to local social and economic development. Policymakers are particularly focused on mitigating the negative hydrological effects of vegetation restoration. Nevertheless, the implications for water yields in the context of forest management types, such as planted and natural forests, remain unclear. In this study, we explored hydrological responses to forest expansion in both planted and natural forest watersheds, utilizing evapotranspiration data synthesized from 12 data products, forest management maps, and climate datasets. Our analysis, based on the Budyko framework, revealed that water yield reduction in arid watersheds with planted forests (PFs) exceeded that in watersheds with expanding natural forests (NFs). Interestingly, vegetation restoration, whether in PFs or NFs watersheds, could even lead to an increase in water yield. Attribution analysis highlighted ecological restoration, rather than climate conditions, as the primary contributor to the observed water yield decrease. In NFs watersheds, the decrease was primarily linked to underlying characteristics, while in PFs watersheds, changes in water yield sensitivity to the land surface played a crucial role. It is noteworthy that vegetation restoration in humid zones exhibited a negligible impact on water yield. Even in NFs watersheds where water yield decreased due to tree cover expansion in drylands, natural growth emerged as a viable option to mitigate local hydrological effects in arid zones.