EGU24-6186, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6186
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Hominin Technology Flourished amid Pliocene Environmental Variance in the Turkana Basin

Dan V. Palcu1,2,3, David R. Braun2,4,5, Eldert Advokaat1, Will S. Archer6, René Bobe7,8, Susana Carvalho7,8, Frances Forrest9,10,11, Ashley S. Hammond10,11, Rahab Kinyanjui2,19, Ana Martini3, Paul Mason1, David B. Patterson4,12, Mark Sier1,13, Priyeshu Srivastava3,14, Kevin Uno15, Amelia Villaseñor16, Jonathan Wynn17, Luigi Jovane3, John W. K. Harris18, and the Koobi Fora Research & Training Program (KFRTP)*
Dan V. Palcu et al.
  • 1Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Netherlands
  • 2Koobi Fora Research & Training Program, National Museums of Kenya, Kenya
  • 3Oceanographic Institute, University of Sao Paulo, Bazil
  • 4Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Anthropology Department, George Washington University, USA
  • 5Technological Primates Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany
  • 6National Museum Bloemfontein, South Africa
  • 7Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique
  • 8Universidade do Algarve, Portugal
  • 9Fairfield University, USA
  • 10American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA
  • 11New York Consortium for Evolutionary Primatology (NYCEP), USA
  • 12University of North Georgia, USA
  • 13Cenieh, Burgos, Spain
  • 14Indian Institute of Geomagnetism, Navi Mumbai, India
  • 15Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, USA
  • 16Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, USA
  • 17Jonathan Wynn, University of South Florida, USA
  • 18Department of Anthropology, Rutgers University, USA
  • 19Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany
  • *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract

This study explores the emergence of Oldowan technology in the northeastern part of the Koobi Fora Formation, focusing on a poorly understood spatial and temporal context. It highlights the dynamic interplay between hominins, landscapes, and climate during the late Pliocene. The archaeological findings present a comprehensive analysis of stone artifacts from the FwJj52 locality that spans the terminal Pliocene- earliest Pleistocene. The technological patterns at the archeological site FwJj52 align with early Oldowan sites, emphasizing an astute understanding of raw material properties by hominins in the region.

Chrono-stratigraphic investigations reveal that the FwJj52 represents a unique locality, corresponding to the Tulu-Bor and Burgi Members of the Koobi Fora Formation, the latter member containing a stratigraphic interval largely absent in the geologic record of East Turkana due to a widespread unconformity. Multi-proxy geochronology (paleomagnetism, tephrostratigraphy) establishes a robust late Pliocene age estimate for the artifact-bearing horizons from FwJj52. Paleoenvironmental proxies (e.g., phytoliths, microcharcoals, plant biomarkers, pedogenic carbonates, soil geochemistry) indicate the area around FwJj52 experienced significant environmental changes. This includes shifts from humid floodplains to semi-arid plains alternating with paleoriver systems, probably triggered by the retreat of paleo-lake shorelines. 

This Interdisciplinary approach, combining archaeology, chrono-stratigraphy, and paleoenvironmental reconstructions, unveils a complex paleoecological narrative, indicating changes in vegetation, water availability, and climate, coinciding with the emergence of Oldowan stone tool technology in East Turkana. The landscape and climatic shifts we document in the northeastern Turkana Basin, Kenya mirror broader trends in eastern Africa during the late Pliocene, influenced by orbitally- forced climate change, tectonics, and reorganizations of paleogeography. These changes had cascading effects on ecosystems, including the expansion of grasslands and alterations in plant and animal species composition in the late Pliocene.

Paleogeographical and paleoecological shifts in the late Pliocene in eastern Africa likely imposed selective pressures on early hominins that could have influenced their behavior. This study emphasizes the reciprocal relationship between landscapes and tool-making endeavors, suggesting that the environments associated with ancient river systems acted as both witnesses to, and catalysts for, the evolution of stone tool technology.

Koobi Fora Research & Training Program (KFRTP):

Kay Behrensmeyer, behrensa@si.edu Amanda McGrosky, amanda.mcgrosky@gmail.com Joanne Munga, joannem@gwu.edu Jonathan S. Reeves, jonathanscott.reeves@gmail.com Kristen Tuosto, k.tuosto@gmail.com

How to cite: Palcu, D. V., Braun, D. R., Advokaat, E., Archer, W. S., Bobe, R., Carvalho, S., Forrest, F., Hammond, A. S., Kinyanjui, R., Martini, A., Mason, P., Patterson, D. B., Sier, M., Srivastava, P., Uno, K., Villaseñor, A., Wynn, J., Jovane, L., and Harris, J. W. K. and the Koobi Fora Research & Training Program (KFRTP): Hominin Technology Flourished amid Pliocene Environmental Variance in the Turkana Basin, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-6186, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6186, 2024.