EGU24-6578, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6578
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Evaluation of hub-height wind forecasts over the New York Bight

Timothy Myers1,2, Allison Van Ormer3, Dave Turner4, James Wilczak2, Laura Bianco1,2, and Bianca Adler1,2
Timothy Myers et al.
  • 1Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA (timothy.myers@noaa.gov)
  • 2Physical Science Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 3Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, USA
  • 4Global Systems Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA

As offshore wind energy development accelerates in the U.S., it is important to assess the accuracy of hub-height wind forecasts from numerical weather prediction models over the ocean.  Leveraging approximately two years of Doppler lidar observations from buoys in the New York Bight, we provide an evaluation of 80-m wind speed forecasts from two weather models: the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model and the Global Forecast System (GFS).  These two models have different horizontal (3 km vs 13 km) grid spacing, vertical layering, initialization methods, and parameterizations of boundary layer mixing and surface-atmosphere interactions.  Even with these differences, the models demonstrate similar and highly skillful short-term forecasts at three measurement sites (Day 1: root mean square error, RMSE, ≤ 2.4 m/s and r≥0.83; Day 2: RMSE≤3 m/s and r≥0.77).  Day-ahead forecasts also exhibit skill (Critical Success Index > ~0.5) in predicting quiescent winds and winds associated with maximum turbine power.  By Day 10, GFS forecasts on average have almost no skill.  Short-term forecast skill by the HRRR and GFS does not strongly depend on season or time of day, yet we find some dependence of the models' performance on near-surface stability.  Additionally, 5-14 day forecasts by the GFS exhibit lower RMSE during summer relative to other seasons.  The high skill of the HRRR and GFS short-term forecasts establishes confidence in their utility for offshore wind energy maintenance and operation.

How to cite: Myers, T., Van Ormer, A., Turner, D., Wilczak, J., Bianco, L., and Adler, B.: Evaluation of hub-height wind forecasts over the New York Bight, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-6578, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6578, 2024.