EGU24-6876, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6876
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

The Influence of Stratospheric Hydration from the Hunga Eruption on Chemical Processing in the Stratospheric Winter Polar Vortices

Michelle Santee1, Gloria Manney2,3, Alyn Lambert1, Luis Millan1, Nathaniel Livesey1, Michael Pitts4, Lucien Froidevaux1, and William Read1
Michelle Santee et al.
  • 1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
  • 2NorthWest Research Associates, Socorro, NM, United States of America
  • 3New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, United States of America
  • 4NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, United States of America

The January 2022 eruption of the undersea Hunga volcano injected an unprecedented amount of water vapor directly into the stratosphere. In this talk, we will use measurements of gas-phase constituents from Aura MLS (Microwave Limb Sounder) and polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) from CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) on CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations) together with meteorological reanalyses to investigate how the extraordinary stratospheric hydration and accompanying anomalies in stratospheric temperature and circulation from Hunga affected chemical processing and ozone destruction in the polar lower stratosphere. We will focus on the Antarctic ozone hole season of 2023, when the excess moisture led to unusually early and vertically extensive PSC activity and heterogeneous chlorine activation (i.e., depleted HCl and enhanced ClO) in early winter. Although unmatched in the satellite record, the early-winter upper-level chlorine activation was insufficient to induce substantial ozone loss. Chlorine activation, denitrification, and dehydration processes saturated in midwinter, with trace gas evolution essentially following the climatological mean thereafter. Thus, despite the exceptional early-winter conditions, cumulative ozone losses in the 2023 austral spring were mostly unremarkable because stratospheric chemical processing saturated, as typically happens in the Antarctic. We will also discuss the 2022 Antarctic winter, when the Hunga plume was effectively excluded from the southern polar region by the strong transport barrier at the edge of the vortex. As a result, Hunga had little effect on either the vortex itself or the chemical processing and ozone loss that took place within it during the 2022 Antarctic winter/spring. Finally, we will touch briefly on the influence of Hunga on the 2023/2024 Arctic winter that will have just concluded.

How to cite: Santee, M., Manney, G., Lambert, A., Millan, L., Livesey, N., Pitts, M., Froidevaux, L., and Read, W.: The Influence of Stratospheric Hydration from the Hunga Eruption on Chemical Processing in the Stratospheric Winter Polar Vortices, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-6876, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6876, 2024.