EGU24-6955, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6955
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Significant subglacial and proglacial lake drainages in the Canadian Arctic identified by time-stamped ArcticDEM strips

Whyjay Zheng1 and Wesley Van Wychen2
Whyjay Zheng and Wesley Van Wychen
  • 1Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (whyjayzheng@gmail.com)
  • 2Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada (wvanwychen@uwaterloo.ca)

Active subglacial and proglacial lakes drain and fill constantly, contributing to glacier and ice sheet mass balance in a way that is not always easy to quantify. Active subglacial lakes account for about 20% of the first worldwide subglacial lake inventory (published by Livingstone et al., 2022); however, none have been previously identified in the Canadian Arctic. Here, we report at least 28 drainage and fill events identified by analyzing time-stamped ArcticDEM elevation data. We stack all the available 2-m DEM strips (23,691 in total) from the latest ArcticDEM release (October 2022) and calculate the elevation change rate at every 15-m sized pixel in a reference grid. Glacier areas with the following signals are interpreted to be associated with the lake drainage or refill beneath the ice: (1) a significantly higher elevation change rate than the neighboring regions within the same glacier catchment, and (2) no adjacent zones showing reversed elevation change (to avoid surge event being misclassified). If such an area touches the glacier terminus, we interpret the elevation change to be governed by a proglacial lake where the floating ice terminus rises and falls when the lake level changes. These drainage and refill events are scattered throughout the region, from the North Ellesmere Icefields to Penny Ice Cap (South Baffin Island). Almost none of the lake locations have been previously reported, probably due to their small size (a few kilometers wide on average), but some of them caused significant ice elevation drops of up to 100 meters during a drainage event. It is not clear whether these significant drainage events produced outburst floods due to temporal sampling gaps in the data. Nevertheless, the water mass lost or gained during the events should be independently calculated from the land ice budget, and we should keep monitoring these newly discovered lakes for their potential impact on the ice flow dynamics and localized mass balances, especially in the context of rapid Arctic warming.

How to cite: Zheng, W. and Van Wychen, W.: Significant subglacial and proglacial lake drainages in the Canadian Arctic identified by time-stamped ArcticDEM strips, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-6955, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6955, 2024.