EGU24-8016, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-8016
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Seismicity near Mayotte explained by interacting magma bodies: Insights from numerical modeling

Clement de Sagazan1, Lise Retailleau1,2, Muriel Gerbault3, Aline Peltier1,2, Nathalie Feuillet1, Fabrice J. Fontaine1,2, and Wayne C. Crawford1
Clement de Sagazan et al.
  • 1Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France (desagazan@ipgp.fr)
  • 2Observatoire Volcanologique du Piton de la Fournaise, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, La Plaine des Cafres, La Réunion, France
  • 3IRD, GET, CNRS, OMP, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France

Mayotte island experienced a large volcanic eruption 50 km offshore in 2018-2021, creating the submarine volcano “Fani Maoré”. The eruption was accompanied by intense seismicity at mantle depths (20-45 km), divided into a “proximal” and a “distal” cluster centered 10 and 30 km east from the island, respectively. Previous studies suggest that two separate magma reservoirs may lie at the top and bottom of the proximal cluster. Here, we assess whether two reservoirs are a mechanically viable explanation for the proximal cluster’s truncated conical shape.

We developed finite-element models of pressurized magma reservoirs in a 2D axisymmetric domain, modeling the reservoirs as compliant elastic ellipsoids embedded in an elastoplastic host rock. We find that, at these depths, extremely low friction is required to generate failure at realistically low reservoir pressures. This implies in turn that mechanical weakening must occur at these depths. The weakening could be induced by fractures or pore fluid overpressure in the volcanic system. We find that two superimposed reservoirs can generate a plastic domain between them, if they are spatially close enough. Several reservoir geometries (from spherical to sill-like) are plausible.

A conical fracture domain is more likely to appear for reservoirs with opposite pressure loads (i.e. one inflating, one deflating). Given the geometrical match with the proximal seismicity cluster at Mayotte, we suggest that the shallower (Moho-depth) reservoir is inflating, creating a potential hazard for Mayotte island. 

How to cite: de Sagazan, C., Retailleau, L., Gerbault, M., Peltier, A., Feuillet, N., Fontaine, F. J., and Crawford, W. C.: Seismicity near Mayotte explained by interacting magma bodies: Insights from numerical modeling, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-8016, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-8016, 2024.