EGU24-9008, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9008
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Sea-level projections in recent IPCC reports: how we got here, where we are and where we’re going 

Aimée Slangen1,2, Matthew Palmer3,4, Carolina Camargo5, John Church6, Tamsin Edwards7, Tim Hermans8, Helene Hewitt3, Gregory Garner9, Jonathan Gregory3,10, Robert Kopp9, Victor Malagon Santos1, and Roderik van de Wal2,8
Aimée Slangen et al.
  • 1NIOZ, Estuarine and Delta Systems, Yerseke, Netherlands (aimee.slangen@nioz.nl)
  • 2Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 3Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
  • 4School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • 5Physical Oceanography Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods hole, MA, USA
  • 6Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 7Department of Geography, King’s College London, London, UK
  • 8Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 9Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Rutgers Institute of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
  • 10National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK

Sea-level science has seen many recent developments in observations and modelling of the different contributions and the total mean sea-level change. Here, we focus on sea-level projections in the recent IPCC reports, and discuss (1) the evolution in IPCC projections (“how we got here”), (2) how the projections compare to observations (“where we are”) and (3) the outlook for further improving projections (“where we’re going”). We start by discussing how the model projections of 21st century sea-level change have changed from the IPCC AR5 report (2013) to SROCC (2019) and AR6 (2021), highlighting similarities and differences in the methodologies and comparing the global mean and regional projections. This shows that there is good agreement in the median values, but also highlights some differences. In addition, we discuss how the different reports included high-end projections. We then show how the AR5 projections (from 2007 onwards) compare against the observations, and find that they are highly consistent with each other. Finally, we discuss how to further improve sea-level projections in future studies.

How to cite: Slangen, A., Palmer, M., Camargo, C., Church, J., Edwards, T., Hermans, T., Hewitt, H., Garner, G., Gregory, J., Kopp, R., Malagon Santos, V., and van de Wal, R.: Sea-level projections in recent IPCC reports: how we got here, where we are and where we’re going , EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-9008, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9008, 2024.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material file

Comments on the supplementary material

AC: Author Comment | CC: Community Comment | Report abuse

supplementary materials version 1 – uploaded on 05 Apr 2024, no comments