EGU24-9429, updated on 08 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9429
EGU General Assembly 2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Distributed and time-series estimates of basal melt from Kamb Ice Stream’s grounding zone ocean cavity

Huw Horgan1,2,3, Natalie Robinson4, Craig Stevens4,5, Craig Stewart4, Christina Hulbe6, Justin Lawrence7, Britney Schmidt8, and Peter Washam8
Huw Horgan et al.
  • 1Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland
  • 3Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
  • 4Ocean Observations, National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
  • 5Department of Physics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 6School of Surveying, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • 7Honeybee Robotics, Altadena, California
  • 8Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Melt beneath Antarctica’s large cold-cavity ice shelves remains a major source of uncertainty in ice sheet projections. Beneath these ice shelves melt is typically greatest both at the ice shelf front and at the grounding zone where ice first goes afloat. Grounding zone melt is thought to have a significant influence on ice flow across the grounding line, but can be difficult to estimate using remote sensing methods due to flexure of the overriding ice shelf. Added complexity in the grounding zone is caused by the thin water column, abundant basal crevassing, and the possible addition of subglacial fresh water draining from beneath the ice sheets. Here we present two independent estimates of basal melt from the ocean cavity of Kamb Ice Stream’s grounding zone, Ross Ice Shelf, West Antarctica. The first method uses repeat phase-sensitive radar observations to estimate melt in profiles from approximately 5 km seaward of the grounding line to approximately 3 km upstream of the grounding line. The second method uses an approximately 10-month long time series of oceanographic observations from a site 3.5 km seaward of the grounding line. Both methods are complemented by the high resolution observations provided by the Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) Icefin. The spatially distributed estimates show a more than tripling of melt rate within 5 km of the grounding line. The mooring derived melt rates demonstrate a melt-rate dependence on diurnal and spring-neap tidal currents. The average mooring melt rate more closely matches the radar-based estimates when a drag coefficient previously estimated using Icefin observations is used. Lastly we demonstrate an interesting correlation between mooring derived melt rates and ice shelf surface velocities obtained from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations.

How to cite: Horgan, H., Robinson, N., Stevens, C., Stewart, C., Hulbe, C., Lawrence, J., Schmidt, B., and Washam, P.: Distributed and time-series estimates of basal melt from Kamb Ice Stream’s grounding zone ocean cavity, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-9429, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9429, 2024.