BG3.48 | Land use, land management, and land cover change effects on surface biogeophysics, biogeochemistry, and climate
Land use, land management, and land cover change effects on surface biogeophysics, biogeochemistry, and climate
Convener: Alan Di Vittorio | Co-conveners: Ryan Bright, Gregory Duveiller, Thomas O'Halloran, Julia Pongratz
Orals
| Thu, 18 Apr, 16:15–18:00 (CEST)
 
Room N1
Posters on site
| Attendance Thu, 18 Apr, 10:45–12:30 (CEST) | Display Thu, 18 Apr, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X1
Posters virtual
| Attendance Thu, 18 Apr, 14:00–15:45 (CEST) | Display Thu, 18 Apr, 08:30–18:00
 
vHall X1
Orals |
Thu, 16:15
Thu, 10:45
Thu, 14:00
Land use and land cover change (LULCC), including land management, has the capacity to alter the climate by disrupting land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon, water and energy. Thus, there is a particular interest in understanding the role of LULCC as it relates to climate mitigation (e.g., CO2 removal from the atmosphere) and adaptation (e.g., shifts in land use or management) strategies. Recent work has highlighted tradeoffs between the biogeophysical (e.g. changes in surface properties such as albedo, roughness and evapotranspiration) and biogeochemical effects (e.g., carbon and nitrogen emissions) of land management and change on weather and climate. However, characterizing the relationship between these effects with respect to their extents and the effective net outcome remains challenging due to the overall complexity of the Earth system. Recent advances exploiting Earth system modelling and Earth observation tools are opening new possibilities to better describe LULCC and its effects at multiple temporal and spatial scales. An increasing focus on land-based mitigation and adaptation strategies to meet more stringent emissions targets has expanded the range of land management practices considered specifically for their potential to alter biogeophysical and biogeochemical cycles. This session invites studies that improve our understanding of LULCC-related climate and weather perturbations from biogeophysical and biogeochemical standpoints, either separately or focused on the intersection between these two factors. This includes studies focusing on LULCC that can inform land-based climate mitigation and adaptation policies. Observation-based and model-based analyses at local to global scales are welcome, including those that incorporate both modeling and observational approaches.

Orals: Thu, 18 Apr | Room N1

Chairpersons: Alan Di Vittorio, Gregory Duveiller
16:15–16:20
16:20–16:40
|
EGU24-19668
|
solicited
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Sonia Seneviratne, Michael Windisch, Bianca Biess, Felix Jaeger, Lukas Gudmundsson, Mathias Hauser, Laibao Liu, Quilcaille Yann, Schwaab Jonas, and Sieber Petra

Land use and land cover changes are an essential element of climate change scenarios, both in the context of mitigation and adaptation options (IPCC 2018, 2023). Changes in climate extremes, which belong to the most impactful consequences of on-going climate change (Seneviratne et al. 2021), will however substantially constrain these options, an aspect that is insufficiently factored in so far.

In particular, changes in climate extremes, such as droughts, heatwaves, and fire weather, will substantially affect the potential for afforestation, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and agricultural production, as well as endanger the permanence of terrestrial carbon sinks. In addition, they have substantial impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem resilience, which are not fully assessed so far. On the other hand, land use and land cover changes also affect regional climate extremes through biophysical processes.

This presentation will highlight new results showing the potential impacts of climate extremes for land use projections, including agricultural production potential and nature-based climate mitigation options, as well as feedbacks of the latter on regional climate change. The newest evidence highlights the need for a stronger interaction between the research community working on the physical science basis of human-induced climate change, and those assessing policy options, both for mitigation and adaptation. This has important implications for the development of Integrated Assessment Models and upcoming assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

 

References:

IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.001.

IPCC, 2023: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1-34, doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001

Seneviratne, S.I., X. Zhang, M. Adnan, W. Badi, C. Dereczynski, A. Di Luca, S. Ghosh, I. Iskandar, J. Kossin, S. Lewis, F. Otto, I. Pinto, M. Satoh, S.M. Vicente-Serrano, M. Wehner, and B. Zhou, 2021: Chapter 11: Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1513–1766, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.013. (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter11.pdf)

How to cite: Seneviratne, S., Windisch, M., Biess, B., Jaeger, F., Gudmundsson, L., Hauser, M., Liu, L., Yann, Q., Jonas, S., and Petra, S.: Extreme events and land use changes in the climate crisis, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-19668, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19668, 2024.

16:40–16:50
|
EGU24-8873
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Souleymane Sy, Jan Bliefernicht, Joel Arnault, Christiana Olsesegun, Benjamin Fersch, Ines Spangenberg, Samuel Guug, Abdel Nassirou Yahaya Seydou, Francis Oussou, Moussa Waongo, Windmanagda Sawadogo, Thomas Rummler, Frank Neidl, Patrick Laux, Benjamin Quesada, and Harlad Kunstmann

The West African savannas region is currently undergoing extensive agricultural intensification due to rapid population growth. Those anthropogenic land cover changes (LCC) can have significant impacts at regional and seasonal scales but also on extreme weather events to which human, natural and economical systems are highly vulnerable. However, the effects of LCC on extreme events remain either largely unexplored at regional/local scale and/or without consensus. To address this issue, we investigate the biophysical impacts of idealized land use and land management changes (LCLMCs) scenarios on climate extremes in the semi-arid West African Savannas region. This analysis is conducted using high-resolution land-cover change experiments (at 3 km) covering the period from 2011 to 2023. These experiments utilize the fully coupled WRF-Hydro system, which incorporates surface and subsurface lateral flow while describing the vegetation dynamically. The local effects of idealized LCLMCs scenarios are derived through a comparison of multiple land-use and afforestation scenario-based simulations, reflecting a specific LCC transition, occurring over the Sudan Savanna of Burkina Faso and Ghana.

Analyzing 20 extreme weather indices, we find, on average, that LCC robustly lessens regional extreme rainfall by 8% for the number of wet days (R1mm) and by 7% for the heavy rainfall (R10mm) more than mean rainfall conditions (up to 2 times more). LCC can impact regional rainfall extremes 4 times more than temperature extremes on average and intensifies dry days. Afforestation options, such as the conversion of grassland to evergreen broadleaf forest or evergreen needleleaf forest, tend to mitigate the biophysical LCC-induced warming effect and lower the associated occurrence of temperature extreme events. Conversely, opposite effects can be observed under savannas-based afforestation options, likely due to their associated large sensible heat fluxes compared to grassland and cropland. The study investigates the underlying biophysical drivers behind these opposing effects.

We stress here that fully coupled modeling frameworks incorporating all aspects of land-use change and local positive feedback between the terrestrial hydrological system and the overlying atmosphere are needed to better evaluate land-based mitigation and adaptation strategies.

How to cite: Sy, S., Bliefernicht, J., Arnault, J., Olsesegun, C., Fersch, B., Spangenberg, I., Guug, S., Yahaya Seydou, A. N., Oussou, F., Waongo, M., Sawadogo, W., Rummler, T., Neidl, F., Laux, P., Quesada, B., and Kunstmann, H.: Local biophysical impacts of idealized land-cover and land management changes on climate extremes in the semi-arid West African Savannas, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-8873, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-8873, 2024.

16:50–17:00
|
EGU24-1906
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Jessica Ruijsch, Christopher M. Taylor, Adriaan J. Teuling, and Ronald W.A. Hutjes

Over the past years, many land restoration projects, including natural regeneration and tree planting, have been implemented in West Africa to combat land degradation. In addition, land restoration is often used to increase biodiversity or as a climate change mitigation measure through carbon sequestration. However, as land restoration can also affect the local climate more directly through biogeophysical processes, some projects propose a new use: implement land restoration to alter the water cycle, increase rainfall and water availability, and make regions less vulnerable to climate change.

In general, vegetation can increase cloud cover (and rainfall) through changes in evapotranspiration and moisture availability for cloud formation. At the same time, the albedo and surface roughness can affect the heat fluxes required for convection. Previous research has tried to unravel these general relations between vegetation and cloud cover. Yet, it is currently unknow to what extend land restoration projects, which usually have a limited spatial extend, can affect cloud cover in West Africa.

In this study, we use observational remote sensing data to study the relations between vegetation and cloud cover in the context of land restoration. The Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) satellite provides 20 years of data at a 15 minute temporal resolution. Yet, the spatial resolution of 3 km of the available MSG cloud cover products is relatively coarse to study convective clouds over small vegetated areas. Instead, we apply a statistical algorithm to calculate cloud cover from the MSG High Resolution Visible (HRV) band, in order to obtain cloud cover data on a 1 km resolution. Using this method, we can provide high resolution observational evidence of cloud cover-vegetation relationships across West Africa.

Preliminary results show that in Nigeria and Benin, cloud cover frequency is higher in areas with a high vegetation cover than in surrounding areas with a lower vegetation cover. With this study, we provide insight into whether land restoration projects can be used to increase cloud cover and adapt to the negative consequences of global climate change.

How to cite: Ruijsch, J., Taylor, C. M., Teuling, A. J., and Hutjes, R. W. A.: The effect of land restoration on cloud cover in West Africa, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-1906, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1906, 2024.

17:00–17:06
17:06–17:16
|
EGU24-6466
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Souleymane Diop, Rémi Cardinael, Ronny Lauerwald, Morgan Ferlicoq, Christian Thierfelder, Regis Chikowo, Marc Corbeels, and Eric Ceschia

The biogeochemical effects of conservation agriculture (CA), such as soil organic carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions, have been extensively studied. However, recent research has shown that management practices also have biogeophysical effects on both local and global climates by altering surface albedo and energy partitioning. We assessed the biogeophysical impacts of CA in maize fields during two successive seasons (2021/22-2022/23) at two long-term experimental sites in Zimbabwe with contrasting soil properties: Domboshawa Training Center (DTC) with a light abruptic Lixisol (sandy soil) and the University of Zimbabwe Farm (UZF) with a dark xanthic Ferralsol (clayey soil). We monitored surface albedo, longwave radiation, leaf area index (LAI), and soil moisture/temperature under three treatments: conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and no-tillage with mulch (NTM).  Our findings reveal that, across all treatments during the two monitored seasons, the average surface albedo of the xanthic Ferralsol at UZF was consistently lower than that of the abruptic Lixisol at DTC. It results a cooling effect in both NT and NTM treatments compared to CT in the clayey soil at UZF. During the 2021/22 season, the mean annual radiative forcing (RF) of NT and NTM were -0.83 W.m-² and -0.43 W.m-2 respectively, while during the second season (2022/23) the annual mean RF was -1.43 W.m-2  for NT and -1.03 W.m-2 for NTM.On the sandy soil at DTC, a warming effect was observed due to soil darkening induced by mulching. The mean annual RF of NT in this site was -3.34 W.m-2 during the first season and -2.78 W.m-2 during the second. In contrast, NTM showed a warming effect with an RF of 1.2 W.m-2 in 2021/22, and 2.77 W.m-2 during the 2022/23 season. The RF induced by albedo change were converted into CO2-equivalents in order to compare it with biogeochemical effects of CA through changes in soil N2O emissions and SOC storage. The results demonstrated an opposite effect on RF and of the same magnitude between albedo and soil organic carbon (SOC) in the NT and NTM treatments at DTC, suggesting that CA might not bring any mitigation benefit if mulch is applied on light coloured soils.

How to cite: Diop, S., Cardinael, R., Lauerwald, R., Ferlicoq, M., Thierfelder, C., Chikowo, R., Corbeels, M., and Ceschia, E.: Interaction between soil type and cropping system on albedo dynamics leads to contrasted impact on climate mitigation, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-6466, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6466, 2024.

17:16–17:26
|
EGU24-21188
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
Gaëlle Wanlin, Nathan Carlier, Johan Six, Travis Drake, Lissie de Groot, Antoine de Clippele, Josepth Zambo Mandea, and Kristof Van Oost

The Kasai basin (DRCongo), southwest part of the Congo Basin, displays a unique array of climatic conditions, mineralogical compositions and land use trajectories. It is currently experiencing an explosive demographic expansion, which leads to drastic land use and land cover changes (LULCC) such as deforestation and cropland expansion. The net terrestrial C exchange from both vegetation and soils accompanying land use change is relatively well constrained. In contrast, C exchange associated with accelerated soil erosion following the degradation of natural habitats is an uncertain component of the carbon budgeta,b,c, particularly in tropical settingsd,e,f.
To remedy this lack of knowledge, we used remote sensing techniques in conjunction with field observations and preexisting datasets describing potential drivers such as Worldpopg, global Human Modificationh, etc. We analyzed the temporal evolution of LULCC and its drivers within the Kasai Basin at high spatial resolutions. Preliminary results show a discernable surge in deforestation rates, varying across the different sub-basins, alongside expansions in cropland cultivation and artisanal mining activities, all recognized as contributors to heightened soil erosion. Using estimated time series of suspended sediment yield derived from in-situ measurements and remote sensing products as an indicator for upland soil erosion, we compared observed changes in sediment yield to LULCC trajectories. We also conducted a robust sampling campaign and collected over 5000 soil samples from 15 hillslopes transects alongside the Kasai River. Multiple soil organic carbon (SOC) analyses were realized to investigate C dynamics in tropical eroding uplands: carbon and nitrogen content and stable isotopes, soil texture, clay mineralogy and fallout radionuclide inventory of a selection of samples, and MIR spectroscopy to have high depth resolution results.
The results of our study will provide insights into the environmental drivers responsible for the heightened soil erosion and lateral carbon fluxes observed within the Kasai Basin. The forthcoming study of these fluxes will improve the knowledge of the tropical C budget in eroding upland soils.

 

REFERENCES
a Stallard, R. F. (1998). Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12(2), 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1029/98GB00741

b Berhe, A. A. et al. (2007). Bioscience, 57, 337–346, https://doi.org/10.1641/B570408

cVan Oost, K. et al. (2007). Science, 318(5850), 626–629. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145724

d Don, A. et al. (2011). Global Change Biology, 17(4), 1658–1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x

e Reichenbach, M. et al. (2023). Global Change Biology, 00, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16622

f Wilken, F. et al. (2020). Soil, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5194/SOIL-7-399-2021

g Lloyd, C. T. et al. (2017). Scientific Data, 4(1), 170001. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.1

h Kennedy, C.M. et al. (2019). Global Change Biology, 25(3), 811–826. doi:10.1111/gcb.14549

How to cite: Wanlin, G., Carlier, N., Six, J., Drake, T., de Groot, L., de Clippele, A., Zambo Mandea, J., and Van Oost, K.: Land Use and upland soil erosion dynamics along climatic and human disturbance gradients in the Kasai Basin (DR Congo), EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-21188, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-21188, 2024.

17:26–17:32
17:32–17:42
|
EGU24-3067
|
ECS
|
On-site presentation
James A. King, James Weber, Peter Lawrence, Stephanie Roe, Abigail Swann, and Maria Val Martin

Global-scale afforestation, reforestation, and forest restoration have gained significant attention as climate change mitigation strategies due to their significant carbon dioxide removal (CDR) potential. However, there has been limited research into the unintended consequences of increasing global forest cover from a biophysical perspective. Using the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2), we apply a plausible global forestation scenario, which aligns with current net zero proposals and commitments, within a Paris Agreement-compatible warming scenario to investigate the land surface and hydroclimate response. Compared to a control scenario where land use is fixed to present-day levels, the forestation scenario is significantly cooler at low latitudes (0.8°C-3.0°C) by 2100, driven by a 10% increase in evaporative cooling in forested areas. However, shifts from grassland or shrubland to forest (afforestation) lead to a doubling of plant water demand in some regions, causing significant decreases in soil moisture (5% globally) and water availability (10% globally) in regions with increased forest cover. While there are some increases in low cloud and seasonal precipitation over these regions, with lower and in some places negative cloud radiative forcing, the impacts on large-scale precipitation and atmospheric circulation are limited. This contrasts with the response of precipitation to simulated large-scale deforestation reported in previous modelling studies, which significantly decreased low-latitude rainfall. The forestation scenario demonstrates local cooling benefits in low latitudes without major disruption to global hydrodynamics beyond those already projected to result from climate change, in addition to the cooling associated with CDR. However, the water demands of extensive afforestation of non-forest biomes have implications for its viability given uncertainty in future precipitation changes, especially in the tropics.

How to cite: King, J. A., Weber, J., Lawrence, P., Roe, S., Swann, A., and Val Martin, M.: Global and Regional Hydrological Impacts of Global-Scale Forest Expansion, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-3067, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-3067, 2024.

17:42–17:52
|
EGU24-12591
|
Highlight
|
On-site presentation
Niels Andela

Global CO2 emissions from land use and land cover changes contribute about 10% of anthropogenic carbon emissions annually, while terrestrial ecosystems also remove about 29% of annual emissions through enhanced growth and ecosystem recovery. The conservation and restoration of soils, woody biomass and other carbon pools have therefore emerged as key components of national and corporate net zero strategies. Both compliance and voluntary carbon markets, including bilateral and global carbon trading agreements, have the potential to accelerate emissions reductions and removals at local, national, and global scales. The success of these markets relies on effective policy frameworks, transparency and independent assessments of project integrity. Trust in the voluntary markets was shaken during 2023 following media reports of over crediting, while at COP28 nations failed to agree on standards and frameworks for Article 6 of the Paris agreement (on bilateral and UN-supervised carbon markets). 

 

Carbon ratings agencies provide independent analysis on the effectiveness and claims of carbon projects operating within the voluntary market. These assessments strengthen trust through greater transparency and price discovery, so that funding can be unlocked for the most effective projects. Here we will discuss challenges and opportunities for scaling the carbon markets, based on our assessment of over 130 nature-based carbon projects globally, assessing key risk factors such as project additionality (what would have happened in the absence of carbon finance), carbon accounting, and non-permanence (risk of future reversal). Our methodologies combine novel monitoring tools, including satellite observations and machine learning models, with information about project finances and policy context to assess the efficacy of every credit issued. Lessons learned can help emerging markets scale, and inform future projections and modelling frameworks of terrestrial carbon fluxes.

How to cite: Andela, N.: The role of carbon markets in reducing carbon emissions and strengthening the land sink at scale, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-12591, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-12591, 2024.

17:52–18:00

Posters on site: Thu, 18 Apr, 10:45–12:30 | Hall X1

Display time: Thu, 18 Apr 08:30–Thu, 18 Apr 12:30
Chairpersons: Alan Di Vittorio, Gregory Duveiller
Global studies
X1.58
|
EGU24-1513
Xing Luo, Jun Ge, Yipeng Cao, Yu Liu, Limei Yang, Shiyao Wang, and Weidong Guo

Land use and land cover changes (LULCCs) can influence surface temperature through local and nonlocal biophysical processes. However, the local and nonlocal effects of historical LULCCs have rarely been explicitly investigated. In this study, we separate the local and nonlocal effects of historical (1985–2014) human land use activities based on a set of simulations with and without LULCCs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6. We also attempt to explore the sources of the intermodel difference in the LULCC effects using a variance decomposition method. The results show that the nonlocal effects (-0.06 ℃ at the global scale) dominate the cooling effect of historical LULCCs mainly via decreases in downward longwave radiation and increases in upward shortwave radiation. The local effects are relatively small at the global scale (0.01 ℃) and manifest as warming at low latitudes (driven by weakened sensible and latent heat fluxes) and cooling in the boreal regions (driven by enhanced upward shortwave radiation). There remains a large intermodel uncertainty in the total effects of historical LULCCs, most of which is contributed by the intermodel difference in nonlocal effects. Such intermodel inconsistency in nonlocal effects is mainly attributed to the intermodel difference in changes in downward longwave radiation and surface sensible heat flux. This study highlights the importance of nonlocal effects of historical LULCCs in terms of the magnitude and the contribution to the intermodel uncertainty in the LULCC effects.

How to cite: Luo, X., Ge, J., Cao, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, L., Wang, S., and Guo, W.: Local and nonlocal biophysical effects of historical land use and land cover changes in CMIP6 models and the intermodel uncertainty, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-1513, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-1513, 2024.

X1.59
|
EGU24-6600
|
ECS
Yi Yao, Yusuke Satoh, Nicole van Maanen, Sabin Taranu, Seppe Lampe, Yoshihide Wada, David Lawrence, Bill Sacks, Will Weider, Jonas Jägermeyr, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, and Wim Thiery

Irrigation plays an essential role in the Earth system by changing water, energy, and carbon fluxes, and then affecting the climate. Many previous studies have been conducted to explore its impacts on near-surface climate, highlighting its cooling effects on air temperature, especially during hot extremes. However, most studies do the exploration during the historical period and only focus on temperature. Projected greenhouse gas emissions and land use datasets have made it possible to extend the investigation under future scenarios, but there are no datasets about predicted irrigation techniques shares information. To address this issue, we create a dataset containing spatial distribution of drip, sprinkler, and flood irrigation techniques, based on a simple assumption that richer and drier countries will invest more in irrigation system upgrades. Then, the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2) is developed to be able to represent different irrigation techniques for one crop type in one gridcell. Finally, with the newly created dataset and modified CESM2, we detect irrigation's impacts on heat and moist-heat stress under SSP1-2.6 and SSP3-7.0. Simulation outputs indicate that irrigation will experience various changes among regions and scenarios. In irrigation hot spots, irrigation will continue to reduce the probability of high-temperature extremes under both scenarios but cannot reverse the warming signal caused by other forcings. Moreover, irrigation's impacts on apparent temperature are very small, and even increase the hours exposed to wet bulb temperature extremes in some regions. This study reveals that irrigation's cooling impacts will persist in the future, but will not be an effective solution to the global warming issue. As for moist-heat stress, irrigation's effects are much more complicated due to its enhancing impacts on air humidity.

How to cite: Yao, Y., Satoh, Y., van Maanen, N., Taranu, S., Lampe, S., Wada, Y., Lawrence, D., Sacks, B., Weider, W., Jägermeyr, J., Schleussner, C.-F., and Thiery, W.: Irrigation-induced impacts on near-surface climate under future scenarios, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-6600, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6600, 2024.

X1.60
|
EGU24-18269
Jens Heinke and Christoph Müller

Agricultural management can significantly impact biogeochemical cycles. In this study, we estimate the effect of various agricultural management practices such as grazing management, manure application, residue management, tillage, and cover crops on land use change emissions using the LPJmL dynamic vegetation model. We follow the TRENDY protocol to perform model simulations and estimate land use change emissions. Our results show that these practices mitigate a large proportion of emissions from land conversion (such as deforestation) and thus substantially determine the size of the current terrestrial carbon sink. We argue that there is substantial potential to further enhance carbon sequestration by optimizing agricultural management practices. We demonstrate that changes in agricultural management practices typically have smaller effects on albedo, surface roughness, and evapotranspiration compared to dedicated CO2 removal techniques that entail land cover changes (such as afforestation). However, due to limited global data on agricultural management practices, the actual contribution of these practices to emissions and their potential to reduce emissions remain highly uncertain. Our study highlights the need for more research in this area and the importance of considering agricultural management practices in dynamic vegetation models to estimate land use change emissions accurately.

How to cite: Heinke, J. and Müller, C.: Agricultural management determines the size of the terrestrial carbon sink, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-18269, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-18269, 2024.

X1.61
|
EGU24-15336
|
ECS
Inne Vanderkelen, Benjamin D. Stocker, Sean Swenson, David Lawrence, and Edouard L. Davin

Soil carbon sequestration is an important strategy for climate change mitigation. Soil carbon stocks on agricultural lands can be augmented through sustainable land management practices such as organic manures addition, cover cropping, mulching, conservation tillage and agroforestry. Soil carbon sequestration has several co-benefits, of which increased water holding capacity and infiltration are often named. However, a global scale quantification of these hydrological co-benefits for water availability is still lacking.

In this study, we aim to quantify how soil carbon sequestration impacts soil water budget and availability, to identify potential hydrological co-benefits. We use the Community Land Model (CLM) version 5.2 in land-only mode with prescribed phenology to conduct idealized experiments simulating present-day climate conditions with altered soil carbon stocks after 20 years of sequestration. Three scenarios of carbon sequestration are investigated, based on spatially explicit soil organic carbon input maps. These include two scenarios with high and medium sequestration rates focused on cropland. Additionally, an aspirational scenario with a 0.4% annual increase in soil organic carbon stocks is conducted, which follows the "4 per mille" initiative target.

Upon analyzing the simulations at subgrid level for the crop fraction of the grid cell, our findings indicate that, overall, soil carbon sequestration enhances the water holding capacity by increasing the field capacity and reducing the permanent wilting point of the soil. This increase in water holding capacity predominantly arises from augmented porosity, which in turn surpasses the rise in actual water content. Consequently, the saturated fraction of soils across most regions decreases.

Furthermore, CLM simulations consistently demonstrate that elevated carbon stocks reduce the surface runoff and subsurface drainage, and increase soil evaporation. The upper soil layers, corresponding to the layers with elevated soil carbon, exhibit increased water content, whereas lower layers indicate either negligible or slight water content reduction. This is particularly accentuated in arid regions, which leading to an overall decline in water content in these areas. Finally, water stress is found to be decreasing, which indicates improved water retention in carbon-sequestered soil and enhances the soil sponginess. Overall, despite remaining modelling uncertainties, particularly linked to soil hydrological parametrizations and their dependency on soil carbon fractions, these sensitivity experiments reveal the potential of carbon sequestration to increase water availability and counteract water scarcity.

How to cite: Vanderkelen, I., Stocker, B. D., Swenson, S., Lawrence, D., and Davin, E. L.: Investigating the hydrological co-benefits of soil carbon sequestration using a land surface model, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-15336, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15336, 2024.

X1.62
|
EGU24-14276
Alan Di Vittorio, Dalei Hao, Timothy Shippert, Balwinder Singh, Eva Sinha, and Ben Bond-Lamberty

Understanding human-environment feedbacks is becoming increasingly important as climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies continue to diversify, target new areas, and grow in extent. Incorporating these feedbacks into models is critical for assessing the effectiveness of such strategies and how they may change in response to a changing climate. For example, projected forest expansion varies with changing climate because climate-driven changes in forest productivity affect the cost-effectiveness of reforestation strategies. Including human-environment feedbacks in models can dramatically change the projected scenario as human systems respond to the changing environment, which in turn affects the Earth system projection.

 

We have incorporated human-Earth feedbacks in a synchronously coupled system comprising the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) and the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM). GCAM is the core model in a new E3SM human component that is at the same level as the Earth model components (land, atmosphere, ocean, etc.) and interacts with them through the shared coupling software. Terrestrial productivity is passed from E3SM to GCAM to make climate-responsive land use and CO2 emission projections for the next five-year period, which are interpolated and passed to E3SM annually. Previous experiments with a similar model have shown that the incorporation of these feedbacks affects land use/cover change, crop prices, terrestrial carbon, local surface temperature, and land carbon-atmosphere feedbacks. Preliminary results indicate that this newly coupled system is robust in relation to the previous experiments. The human scenario is altered by terrestrial feedbacks, which in turn changes the Earth system projections. Regional differences are more pronounced than global differences due to regional shifts in land use. This new coupling addresses inconsistency across models, enables a new type of scenario development, and provides a modeling framework that is more easily updated and expanded.

How to cite: Di Vittorio, A., Hao, D., Shippert, T., Singh, B., Sinha, E., and Bond-Lamberty, B.: Human-Earth feedbacks in E3SM-GCAM successfully simulate the evolution of a combined human-Earth system, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-14276, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-14276, 2024.

X1.63
|
EGU24-17965
|
ECS
Meri Räty, Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik, and Julia Pongratz

Fostering sustainable management of forests is pivotal in advancing Europe's climate resilience and achieving its short- and long-term environmental objectives. Any management strategy has multifaceted impacts, influencing carbon cycling and also leading to biogeophysical consequences arising from altered energy partitioning in the forest, for example. Modelling can offer valuable insights into these complexities, making it a beneficial tool aiding the pursuit of science-based solutions to inform policy and decision-making processes. 
 
This work introduces improvements in the representation of wood harvesting and different forest management scenarios in JSBACH4, the current version of the land component of the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic Earth System Model (ICON-ESM) framework. The previously established forest age class scheme of JSBACH 4 and the extensive forest parameters and harvesting schemes from the model G4M-X (by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis) are utilised in the development.  This combination of a detailed forestry model integrated into decision-making frameworks, coupled with an advanced land surface model intricately linking to the entirety of key climate processes, holds great potential to enhance our understanding for the management of ecosystems. The objective of this effort is to enhance the sophistication of the related forest parameters in JSBACH4, enabling a more comprehensive simulation of various forest management scenarios.  This will allow capturing the nuanced carbon cycling and biogeophysical effects associated with different types of forest management and wood harvesting practices.

How to cite: Räty, M., Lessa Derci Augustynczik, A., and Pongratz, J.: Refining the Representation of Forest Management Practices in JSBACH4 , EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-17965, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-17965, 2024.

Regional studies
X1.64
|
EGU24-19146
|
ECS
|
Adele Zaini, Sara M. Blichner, Jing Tang, Rosie A. Fisher, Marianne T. Lund, and Terje K. Berntsen

A poleward migration of vegetation is expected in response to rising surface temperatures in the boreal zone and the Arctic regions. This land cover change is proposed to have important impacts on the climate through biogeophysical and biogeochemical feedback mechanisms (Brovkin, 2002; Bonan, 2015; Spracklen et al., 2008). While the benefits of CO2 uptake from forest expansion are better known, further exploration is needed to disentangle the full spectrum of consequences that such a significant land cover change can lead to, including changes in surface albedo, Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (BVOC) emissions, evapotranspiration, and turbulent fluxes. These might have an even larger quantitative impact on the climate than carbon sequestration itself at these latitudes (Bonan, 2015).

In this work, we use the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) to simulate the climatic impacts of both idealized and more realistic (forecast using a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model) patterns of high-latitude vegetation expansion with a specific focus on quantifying the radiative forcing of the albedo and BVOC emissions-related changes affecting aerosols and clouds.

The results show that the expected vegetation migration in the northern latitudes can have a substantial impact on a global scale. In total, the surface albedo changes dominate at these high latitudes (+0.48 W/m2, as average value over 50°N) over the effects from changes in aerosols and clouds related to changes in BVOC emissions, resulting in a total of +0.43 W/m2. Surprising results are found regarding the BVOC emission-related impacts. We expected that the indirect impact on cloud radiative effect from increasing BVOC emissions and subsequent aerosol formation, would lead to a cooling effect. However, the BVOC-related contribution to the total radiative forcing is +0.01 W/m2, and to the forcing related to changes in cloud properties is +0.05 W/m2. This signal is small but positive. This is consistent with the observed decrease in aerosol and cloud droplet number concentrations (respectively -0.18% and -1.00%), which affect the cloud albedo by lowering it. The processes that take place from the increase in BVOC emissions to its impact on the radiative forcing revealed complexity that needs to be further disentangled. A deeper understanding of atmospheric chemistry, aerosol and cloud formation, dynamics, and interactions at these latitudes is necessary to fully understand the role of large-scale ecosystem shifts in the coupled climate system. 

How to cite: Zaini, A., Blichner, S. M., Tang, J., Fisher, R. A., Lund, M. T., and Berntsen, T. K.: Exploring the biogeophysical and biogeochemical impacts of an Arctic poleward expansion of the boreal forest, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-19146, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19146, 2024.

X1.65
|
EGU24-17272
Marcus Breil, Vanessa Schneider, and Joaquim Pinto

Afforestation affects the earth’s climate system by changing the biogeochemical and biogeophysical characteristics of the land surface. While the regional effects of afforestation are well understood in the tropics and the high-latitudes, its climate impact on the mid-latitudes is still subject of scientific discussions. The general impact of afforestation on the regional climate conditions in Europe during the last decades is investigated in this study. For this purpose, regional climate simulations are performed with different forest cover fractions over Europe. In a first simulation, afforestation in Europe is considered, while this is not the case for a second simulation.  We focus on the years 1986-2015, a period in which the forest cover in Europe increased comparatively strong, accompanied by a strong general warming over the continent.

Results show that afforestation has both local and non-local effects on the regional climate system in Europe. Due to an increased transport of turbulent heat (latent + sensible) into the atmosphere, afforestation leads to a significant reduction of the mean local surface temperatures in summer. In northern Europe, mean local surface temperatures were reduced about -0.3 K with afforestation, in central Europe about -0.5 K and in southern Europe about -0.8 K. During heat periods, this local cooling effect can reach to -1.9 K. In winter, afforestation results in a slight local warming both in northern and southern Europe, because of the albedo effect of forests. However, this effect is rather small and the mean temperature changes are not significant. In downwind direction, locally increased evapotranspiration rates with afforestation increase the general cloud cover, which results in a slight non-local warming in winter in several regions of Europe, particularly during cold spells. Thus, afforestation had a discernible impact on the climate change signal in Europe during the period 1986-2015, which may have mitigated the general warming trend in Europe, especially on the local scale in summer.

How to cite: Breil, M., Schneider, V., and Pinto, J.: The effect of forest cover changes on the regional climate conditions in Europe during the period 1986-2015, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-17272, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-17272, 2024.

X1.66
|
EGU24-13862
Yizhuo Wang, Martin Dallimer, and Cat Scott

Dryland ecosystems worldwide face substantial degradation due to adverse climatic conditions and unsustainable land practices. This is particularly evident in Africa's Sahel region, where extensive land degradation and desertification pose significant challenges to local livelihoods and socio-economic stability. To address this issue, the Great Green Wall Initiative (GGW) aims to restore over 100 million hectares of degraded land to counter desertification and support rural communities.

Here we assess how land use changes have altered ecosystem services within GGW implementation areas. We analyzed the spatiotemporal characteristics of land use change using the MODIS-Global Land Cover product from 2007 to 2019. Based on remote sensing data and established geospatial models, we evaluated five ecosystem services, namely carbon sequestration, soil conservation, sand fixation, water regulation, and food provision. We explored trends in ecosystem service changes, identified spatial clusters of high and low values, and evaluated synergies and trade-offs among these services by Pearson's coefficient and the bivariate Moran’s I method. The result showed that the level of various ecosystem services in GGW areas is heterogeneous, with a large spatial distribution. High values of ecosystem services are found in Burkina Faso, southern Nigeria and eastern Ethiopia. Synergies between ecosystem services are dominant, with the strongest synergies between carbon sequestration and soil conservation. Carbon sequestration and water regulation were clustered, but there were trade-offs with food provision. We quantified the contribution of land use to the changes in ecosystem services through the calculation of the Ecosystem Service Contribution Index (ESCI). The expansion of farmland and desertification have had significant negative impacts on ecosystem services and grassland conversion. This assessment provides critical insights into the efficacy of restoration efforts and aims to offer guidance for informed decision-making in sustainable management practices for dryland ecosystems.

How to cite: Wang, Y., Dallimer, M., and Scott, C.: Effects of land use change on ecosystem services in Africa's Great Green Wall Initiative (GGW) for dryland restoration, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-13862, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-13862, 2024.

X1.67
|
EGU24-9576
|
ECS
Ru Xu, Yan Li, and Édouard Davin

Forests play an important role in regulating land-atmosphere interactions, e.g., the temperature difference (δT) between land surface and air. However, previous studies have primarily focused on analyzing spatial characteristics of δT at global or regional scales, with limited research on its diurnal variations especially using observational data. In this research, we investigated the diurnal changes of δT, using air temperature from large numbers of meteorological stations and surface temperature data from ERA5-Land, for forested areas in China. Results revealed that the diurnal variations in δT (2.18°C) were greater than the observation across seasons (0.8°C), highlighting the importance of considering diurnal scale in understanding δT dynamics. The hourly δT exhibited strong positive correlations with Bowen ratio albeit with a 2-3 hour time lag. Obvious relations also detected between δT and precipitation at daytime, while nighttime relationships remained uncertain when considering the influence of elevation. Simulations from Community Earth System Model (CESM) agree well with the δT-precipitation relations during the daytime, but it overemphasizes the role of elevation in controlling hydrothermal process. We remain hopeful for further enhancement of relevant physical processes in CESM can improve its ability in simulating such interactions.

How to cite: Xu, R., Li, Y., and Davin, É.: The diurnal variation of the difference between surface skin temperature and in-situ 2 m air temperature of forests in China, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-9576, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-9576, 2024.

X1.68
|
EGU24-7483
|
ECS
Impact of inconsistency of multiple land use/land cover products on permafrost modeling on the Tibetan Plateau
(withdrawn)
Yongjie Pan and Xiaoming Xu

Posters virtual: Thu, 18 Apr, 14:00–15:45 | vHall X1

Display time: Thu, 18 Apr 08:30–Thu, 18 Apr 18:00
Chairpersons: Alan Di Vittorio, Thomas O'Halloran
vX1.7
|
EGU24-8311
|
ECS
Jyoti Sharma and Pankaj Kumar

The distribution and composition of forests worldwide are primarily influenced by geographical factors, latitude, and prevailing climatic conditions. These conditions also govern how various types of forests respond to changes in climate. Understanding the feedback loop between vegetation and climate is complex due to regional variations, making it a challenging study area. Previous studies have predominantly focused on the biogeochemical processes, assessing the forest's carbon sequestration potential, while the role of biogeophysical mechanisms- such as evapotranspiration and latent heat flux, apart from albedo- in this relationship remains poorly understood.
The present study aims to comprehensively explore both the biogeochemical and biogeophysical mechanisms operating within Indian forests and their influence on climate by utilizing finer-resolution observational datasets. India, characterized by diverse geographical features, harbors 16 distinct forest types. My initial findings indicate an overall increase in forest cover except in wet evergreen and montane wet temperate forests within India. Additionally, evidence suggests heightened gross primary productivity, suggesting the forests' ability to mitigate warming effects. The study will explore the intricate dynamics of evapotranspiration and other related factors, aiming to unravel their synergistic impact on the regional climate. The findings will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics shaping forest-climate interactions, providing valuable information for sustainable forest management and climate change mitigation strategies.

How to cite: Sharma, J. and Kumar, P.: Exploring the Dynamics of Forests and Climate: A Case Study of India, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-8311, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-8311, 2024.

vX1.8
|
EGU24-17255
|
ECS
Shijie Shu, Jennifer Holm, Alan Di Vittorio, Charles Koven, Ryan Knox, and Gregory Lemieux

Global continual logging activities have modified the regional landscape and disrupted the energy balance through changing the surface albedo, evapotranspiration and roughness length in both current location (local) and nearby areas through feedback to the atmospheric circulation (non-local). Compared to land use change, less attention has been given to understanding the local biogeophysical effect of the different land use management practices, e.g., wood harvest (logging). Uncertainties from the reconstructed global wood harvest rate forcing data, simplified land heterogeneity and processes representation in the classic big-leaf models largely changed the outcomes. We apply a next generation dynamic vegetation model (Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator, FATES), coupled with the land component (ELM) of DOE’s earth system model E3SM to study the local biogeophysical effect and the redistribution of energy after accounting the continuous logging activity on a global scale. In order to account for the uncertainties from forcing data and modeling approaches, we designed 9 parallel experiments with 4 different sets of global wood harvest rates derived from LUH2 reconstructed historical harvest rates combined with 2 different wood harvest methods: area-based harvest and carbon-based harvest. The results highlighted a divergent pattern of the local biogeophysical impact from logging under two dominant stages: regrowth dominant and logging dominant. We found the continuous logging causing up to 5% of the reduction of global canopy coverage and 2% of the increase of albedo. The study also highlighted the uncertainty from the forcing of data sources and modeling approach can lead to a several times difference in the magnitude of local biogeophysical effect.  

How to cite: Shu, S., Holm, J., Di Vittorio, A., Koven, C., Knox, R., and Lemieux, G.: Estimation of local biogeophysical effects of the continuous logging using a dynamic vegetation model forced by C-based wood harvest, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-17255, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-17255, 2024.