EGU26-10126, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10126
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 05 May, 14:55–15:05 (CEST)
 
Room B
Meteorological Drought Monitor for two transboundary regions in Southern Africa
Jonas Appenheimer, Elke Rustemeier, Markus Ziese, and Peter Finger
Jonas Appenheimer et al.
  • Deutscher Wetterdienst, Global Precipitation Climatology Centre, Offenbach am Main, Germany (jonas.appenheimer@dwd.de)

We address a need for hydrometeorological early warning and information systems (EWIS) in Southern Africa. In the project 'Co-Design of Hydrometeorological Information system for Sustainable Water Resource Management in Southern Africa' (Co-HYDIM-SA) we want to enhance water security in the two transboundary regions: Cuvelai-Cunene and Notwane (Namibia and Angola; Botswana and South Africa.

The Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) has many years of experience in hosting an operational and publicly available global drought monitoring service, by combining the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI). For the SPI (SPEI) the 'gamma' ('log-logistic') distribution is fitted to the cumulative distribution function of the precipitation (climatic water balance) data. The main challenge of drought monitoring in the focus region is data scarcity. Therefore, we opted for the well-known and widely used SPI and SPEI, because these rely solely on precipitation and temperature data when calculating the potential evapotranspiration following Thornthwaite (1948). Nevertheless, observation data is difficult to acquire. Only few parameters are available and gaps in time series from stations are often present. That’s why, we work on a flexible data input in the operational system, where we can decide which data source should be used. For precipitation we mainly rely on the gridded GPCC dataset based on station data, whereas for temperature the gridded dataset from the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) is used. Furthermore, we plan to include satellite products (GIRAFE, CHIRPS, GPCP) and reanalysis (ERA5-Land) datasets. For the data acquisition and the implementation of the product, the collaboration with stakeholders in the focus region is essential. Therefore, they are included in the decision making and informed about our progress. The ‘co-design’ approach is an essential part of the project and is achieved by a close partnership with local Universities and a regular contact to the stakeholders.

At the EGU26 I want to present the Co-HYDIM-SA project, my findings and challenges we have encountered. Until today, we have calculated time series for the two Drought Indices (SPI, SPEI) and compared them with specific drought events. In general, the indices are consistent with the described droughts. One disadvantage of the SPI is that it has limitations during the dry season, especially for short term data aggregation. Whereas, the SPEI is characterized by its all-year round usability, due to the integration of potential evapotranspiration in addition to the precipitation data. As a next step, we will compare the grid data to station time series and evaluate the results by calculating skill scores.

References:

  • Thornthwaite, C. W. (1948). An Approach toward a Rational Classification of Climate. Geographical Review, 38(1), 55–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/210739

How to cite: Appenheimer, J., Rustemeier, E., Ziese, M., and Finger, P.: Meteorological Drought Monitor for two transboundary regions in Southern Africa, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-10126, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10126, 2026.