EGU26-10224, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10224
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.240
Open Science Network: Distributed social infrastructure for open scientific discussion
Jorge Saturno1, Ivan Minutillo2, Mayel de Borniol2, Pierre Boudes3, Nicolas Fressengeas4, and Ulrike Hahn5
Jorge Saturno et al.
  • 1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Analytische Chemie der Gasphase, Braunschweig, Germany (jorge.saturno@ptb.de)
  • 2Bonfire Networks
  • 3LIPN / CNRS UMR 7030, Paris, France
  • 4Université de Lorraine, CNRS, IJL, F-54000 Nancy, France
  • 5University of London - Birkbeck, Centre for Cognition, Computation, and Modelling, London, UK

Scientific conversations that once took place on Twitter have scattered to other platforms, such as LinkedIn and Bluesky. Like Twitter, these services operate as walled gardens, limiting access for unregistered users. Furthermore, identity verification and public recognition have become paid services that lack reliability and oversight.

Thanks to a W3C-standardized protocol called ActivityPub, the same one behind Mastodon, open and distributed social feeds, where users from different servers can read and interact, are already available. Using open protocols is the best way to enable scientific communication that both peers and the general public can trust.

The Open Science Network (https://openscience.network/) is designing and deploying a software for federated scientific communication. The app uses Bonfire's open-source framework and the ActivityPub protocol as a backbone. The goal is to create federated digital spaces in which researchers and institutions have complete control over their data, including their conversations and networks. Universities can host their own instances while being interconnected with a global network of scientific communities. Discussions can become citable, FAIR objects with DOIs. Publications are enriched with metadata and collaborative tools.

The Open Science Network is co-designed with researchers, scientific communities, and open science advocates who understand that scientific communication tools shape science itself. Platforms that prioritize engagement over accuracy cannot facilitate reliable scientific communication. The software provides ORCID authentication and Zenodo repository archiving for social posts. Planned features include custom peer review, multiple trust signal workflows, semantic data linking, a framework for experimenting with new forms of scientific communication, proper and verified attribution, federated groups, knowledge management and curation tools, long-term preservation, and space for inventing features not included in this list.

How to cite: Saturno, J., Minutillo, I., de Borniol, M., Boudes, P., Fressengeas, N., and Hahn, U.: Open Science Network: Distributed social infrastructure for open scientific discussion, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-10224, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10224, 2026.