- 1Department of Geosciences, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy (daniel.dreier@studenti.unipd.it)
- 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
- 3Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Probably the most impressive geological feature of active fault zones hosted in carbonate rocks is the presence of several hundreds of meters thick damage zones, often composed of in-situ shattered rocks (ISRs, i.e. rocks fragmented into clasts < 1 cm in size). Despite their abundance, it remains unknown how ISRs form (during the propagation of seismic ruptures?), and how their presence affects (1) the propagation of individual mainshock seismic ruptures, (2) the near field wave radiation and associated strong ground motions, and (3) the evolution in space and time of aftershock seismic sequences. In this contribution, we will present preliminary results of a three-year Ph.D. project aimed at addressing these issues through an integrated field geology and numerical modelling approach.
We exploit existing and newly acquired field geology data on fault damage zone distributions in the Central Apennines (Italy), and perform dynamic rupture earthquake sequence simulations with SeisSol (https://seissol.org). The fully-dynamic individual earthquake simulations with SeisSol rely on the discontinuous Galerkin method, which allows treating complex 3D geological structures, nonlinear rheologies (including off-fault plastic yielding) and high-order accurate propagation of seismic waves (Käser et al., 2010). The earthquake modelling simulations integrate laboratory-derived frictional constitutive laws with simplified and realistic representations of fault zone geometry and surface topography. Currently, our study is focused on the 25 km long Campo Imperatore fault system in the Gran Sasso Massif area (Italian Central Apennines) where the damage zones are pronounced and well mapped (Demurtas et al., 2016; Fondriest et al., 2020).
We aim at using the dynamic rupture earthquake modelling simulations to discuss the formation and distribution of ISRs with respect to (1) the maximum magnitude (Mw 7.0) of the earthquake associated with the studied fault, (2) fault geometry (length, presence of step overs, fault bends, etc.), (3) topographic effects (valleys, etc.), and (4) lithology (limestones, dolostones, etc.) of the wall rocks. This approach is expected to identify the physical, geological, and loading conditions controlling seismic rupture propagation and the development of fault damage zones. The physically based, fully dynamic 3D simulations will also provide estimates of earthquake source parameters (e.g., fracture energy and seismic moment release rate) and synthetic seismograms (strong ground motions), which will be compared with seismological and strong-motion data from earthquakes in the Central Apennines.
References
Demurtas, M., Fondriest, M., Balsamo, F., Clemenzi, L., Storti, F., Bistacchi, A., & Di Toro, G. (2016). Structure of a normal seismogenic fault zone in carbonates: The Vado di Corno Fault, Campo Imperatore, Central Apennines (Italy). Journal of Structural Geology, 90, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2016.08.004
Fondriest, M., Balsamo, F., Bistacchi, A., Clemenzi, L., Demurtas, M., Storti, F., & Di Toro, G. (2020). Structural Complexity and Mechanics of a Shallow Crustal Seismogenic Source (Vado di Corno Fault Zone, Italy). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(9), e2019JB018926. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018926
Käser, M., Castro, C., Hermann, V., & Pelties, C. (2010). SeisSol – A Software for Seismic Wave Propagation Simulations. In High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, Garching/Munich 2009 (pp. 281–292). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13872-0_24
How to cite: Dreier, D., Marchandon, M., Fondriest, M., Gabriel, A.-A., and Di Toro, G.: Formation of Fault Damage Zones in Carbonates and Their Role in the Seismic Cycle, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-10254, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10254, 2026.