- 1Ghent University, Hydro-Climate Extremes Lab, Department of Environment, Gent, Belgium (damian.insuacosta@ugent.be)
- 2Center for Climate Change and Transformation, Eurac Research, Bolzano/Bozen, Italy
- 3Mitiga Solutions, Barcelona, Spain
While the performance of climate models in simulating the magnitude of global warming has been extensively assessed, their fidelity in representing the three-dimensional (3-D) structure of warming, and how this affects extreme event attribution, remains poorly understood. Pseudo-global-warming experiments implicitly assume that imposed anthropogenic warming perturbations realistically capture the observed vertical and horizontal distribution of atmospheric temperature change. However, this assumption is rarely evaluated explicitly.
We diagnose 3-D structural warming discrepancies by comparing a representative set of six CMIP6 climate models against ERA5 temperature trends over 1940–2024. We show that widely used models exhibit systematic vertical and horizontal warming biases, typically over-amplifying warming in the mid-to-upper troposphere while damping the response near the surface, particularly across Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes. We further show that these structural biases propagate into substantially different estimates of extreme rainfall intensification.
Using an ensemble of 81 high-resolution MPAS simulations within a storyline attribution framework, we analyze the October 2024 Valencia flood-producing storm as a high-impact case study. The diagnosed anthropogenic rainfall signal is highly sensitive to the 3-D structure of the imposed warming: CMIP6-based counterfactual experiments yield weak reductions in extreme rainfall (~10%), whereas observation-constrained warming profiles produce a stronger and more significant anthropogenic contribution (~30%). This amplification arises from enhanced low-level moistening and increased convective instability, together with dynamically consistent upper-level flow strengthening. The results confirm that 3-D warming structure is a first-order control on extreme-rainfall attribution, and that persistent model-structural errors can lead to a systematic underestimation of attribution signals in mid-latitude, high-impact precipitation extremes.
How to cite: Insua Costa, D., Lemus Cánovas, M., Senande Rivera, M., M. H. Deman, V., L. Geirinhas, J., and G. Miralles, D.: Extreme rainfall attribution distorted by structural warming biases in climate models, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-10410, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10410, 2026.