EGU26-10645, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10645
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PICO | Wednesday, 06 May, 08:42–08:44 (CEST)
 
PICO spot 2, PICO2.6
Disdrometer-based microphysical contrasts between convective and stratiform rainfall to improve radar rainfall retrievals
Zuzana Rulfova and Katerina Potuznikova
Zuzana Rulfova and Katerina Potuznikova
  • Institute of Atmospheric Physics CAS, Prague, Czechia (rulfova@ufa.cas.cz)

Rainfall retrieval algorithms for weather radars are linked to assumptions about drop size distributions (DSDs), but DSD properties vary strongly across rainfall regimes. To reduce regime-dependent biases in radar-based quantitative rainfall estimation, we use high-temporal-resolution disdrometer observations to quantify microphysical differences between strong convection, embedded convection, and stratiform rainfall with a bright-band, and to test how well these regimes can be separated in the (Dm, log10Nw) phase space, where Dm is the mass-weighted mean diameter and Nw the normalized intercept parameter.

Our analysis shows a systematic convective–stratiform contrast. Strong convection has larger characteristic drop sizes and higher normalized concentrations (mean Dm ≈ 1.07 mm; mean Nw ≈ 2.93 × 104 m−3 mm−1). Embedded convection has slightly smaller Dm but Nw remains comparably high (mean Dm ≈ 1.02 mm; mean Nw ≈ 2.00 × 104 m−3 mm−1). Stratiform rainfall with a bright-band has smaller Dm and markedly lower Nw (mean Dm ≈ 0.92 mm; mean Nw ≈ 6.38 × 103 m−3 mm−1).

Cumulative DSD curves indicate that regime separation is driven primarily by the large-drop tail: strong convection shows the highest contribution of drops above ~2–3 mm, embedded convection is intermediate, and stratiform rainfall declines steeply at large diameters. To translate these findings into an objective regime indicator, we train a linear SVM (Support Vector Machine) on canonical samples (strong convection vs stratiform rainfall with a bright-band) and apply it to all events. Convective and stratiform rainfall are largely separable, while embedded convection occurs on both sides of the boundary, supporting a probabilistic classification with a transition band. These results provide microphysical insights that can be used to refine regime-dependent radar retrieval parameterizations and improve radar-based rainfall estimates at hydrologically relevant scales.

How to cite: Rulfova, Z. and Potuznikova, K.: Disdrometer-based microphysical contrasts between convective and stratiform rainfall to improve radar rainfall retrievals, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-10645, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10645, 2026.