EGU26-10768, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10768
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 08 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Friday, 08 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.82
Forward modelling of SF6 with ICON-ART
Maya Harms1, Katharina Meixner2, Tanja Schuck2, Thomas Wagenhäuser2, Sascha Alber3, Kieran Stanley4, Andreas Engel2, Valentin Bruch1, Thomas Rösch1, Martin Steil1, and Andrea Kaiser-Weiss1
Maya Harms et al.
  • 1German Meteorological Service, Offenbach am Main, Germany
  • 2Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 3Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
  • 4University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is a highly potent greenhouse gas (GHG). Despite its high global warming potential (GWP), it continues to be produced and used in Germany. The reported emission estimates can be used to calculate expected concentrations at measurements sites. Within the PARIS (Process Attribution of Regional Emissions) project we used the operational numerical weather prediction model ICON (ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic) and its extension module for aerosol and trace gases (ART) as an Eulerian forward model to calculate the expected mixing concentrations response of Germany's largest point source of SF6. We compared the modelled concentration peaks that occur when the modelled plume crosses the measurement site of the Taunus observatory (TOB) with the respective observed signals (requiring background subtraction). The 4-year period of 2020-2023 was covered, and the uncertainty of the meteorological transport was estimated using a 20-member ensemble in our limited area model for Europe, which was run with a horizontal grid resolution of 6.5 km and 74 vertical levels.The model predicts well when peaks are measured but weWe found that most observed peaks at TOB are considerably higher than in the model, suggesting that prior emissions estimates were too low. 
This indicates that the independent, observation-based emission estimate of our ICON-ART based system is in the range of double-digit tons, which is considerably higher than the self-reported SF6 emission estimate for this point source, also if the model uncertainties are taken into account. 

How to cite: Harms, M., Meixner, K., Schuck, T., Wagenhäuser, T., Alber, S., Stanley, K., Engel, A., Bruch, V., Rösch, T., Steil, M., and Kaiser-Weiss, A.: Forward modelling of SF6 with ICON-ART, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-10768, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10768, 2026.