EGU26-10775, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10775
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X2, X2.56
Constraining properties of mantle circulation models using disparate observations
J. Huw Davies1, James Panton1,9, Abigail Plimmer1,10, Paul Beguelin1, Morton Andersen1, Andy Nowacki2, Stepehn Mason2, Chris Davies2, Bob Myhill3, Tim Elliott3, James Wookey3, Gareth Roberts4, Conor O'Malley4, Ana Ferreira5, William Sturgeon5, Oli Shorttle6, Walker Andrew6, Paula Koelemeijer7, Franck Latallerie7,11, and Andy Biggin8
J. Huw Davies et al.
  • 1Cardiff University, Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff, United Kingdom (daviesjh2@cardiff.ac.uk)
  • 2School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • 3School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • 4Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • 5Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
  • 6Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • 8Dept. of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • 9Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany
  • 10Department of Earth Science, Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • 11School of Energy, Reykjavík University, Reykjavik, Iceland

Properties of the mantle are difficult to constrain and critical for controlling mantle evolution and dynamics. We attempt to constrain these properties by comparing the outputs from mantle circulation models (MCMs) to 9 disparate observations.  Over 250 MCMs driven at the surface by 1 Ga of plate motion history are considered. A metric is developed to quantify the fit/misfit between each observation and MCM prediction. The observations include, global seismic tomography, SOLA seismic inference of the Pacific upper mantle, global surface wave phase velocity data set, gradients of seismic velocity in the deep mantle, dynamic topography, geoid, geomagnetic reversals, temperature difference between MORB and OIB source regions, and the difference in amount of recycled oceanic crust in MORB versus OIB source regions. The comparisons are done with (i) heatmaps of each metric for each MCM, (ii) correlation between the metrics and input parameters, (iii) analyses of sub-sets where only a single MCM parameter is changed, (iv) random forest analysis where the importance and partial dependence plot of MCM parameters are produced for each metric. From this analysis we find that parameters can be constrained, including for example the temperature at the core mantle boundary, the preferred equation of state, the preferred plate motion history model, the presence of a basal layer, the buoyancy number of the recycled basalt, viscosity profile. For example the MCMs prefer a cooler core-mantle boundary, a mantle reference frame-based plate motion history, a Murnaghan EoS and a basalt buoyancy number in the lower mantle of around 0.4-0.5. Methods, analyses and further results will be presented.

How to cite: Davies, J. H., Panton, J., Plimmer, A., Beguelin, P., Andersen, M., Nowacki, A., Mason, S., Davies, C., Myhill, B., Elliott, T., Wookey, J., Roberts, G., O'Malley, C., Ferreira, A., Sturgeon, W., Shorttle, O., Andrew, W., Koelemeijer, P., Latallerie, F., and Biggin, A.: Constraining properties of mantle circulation models using disparate observations, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-10775, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10775, 2026.