EGU26-10949, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10949
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 10:05–10:15 (CEST)
 
Room 0.14
Large-Scale Ocean Circulation During the Early and Middle Miocene: Insights from MioMIP1 Simulations
Trusha Naik1,2, Agatha de Boer1,2, Helen Coxall1,2, Natalie Burls3, Catherine Bradshaw4,5, Yannick Donnadieu6, Alexander Farnsworth7,8, Amanda Frigola9,10, Nicholas Herold11, Matthew Huber12, Mehdi Pasha Karami13, Gregor Knorr14, Allegra LeGrande15,16, Yousheng Li7, Gerrit Lohmann10,14, Daniel Lunt7, Matthias Prange10, and Yurui Zhang17
Trusha Naik et al.
  • 1Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. (trusha.naik@geo.su.se)
  • 2Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 3Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Earth Sciences, Center for Ocean-Land Atmosphere Studies, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
  • 4The Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • 5Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.
  • 6Aix Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, Coll France, INRA, CEREGE, Aix en Provence, France.
  • 7School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • 8Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
  • 9Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain.
  • 10MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
  • 11School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • 12Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
  • 13Rossby Centre, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden.
  • 14Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany.
  • 15NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA.
  • 16Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • 17State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean & Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
The early and middle Miocene (~20–12 Ma) was a time of major global tectonic and climatic reorganisation; yet the structure and evolution of large-scale ocean circulation during this period remain poorly understood. In particular, the timing and mechanisms governing the transition from a Pacific-dominated overturning regime to the modern Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) are still debated. Here, we investigate both meridional overturning and wind-driven horizontal circulation during the Miocene using an ensemble of 14 fully coupled climate model simulations from the MioMIP1 framework.
Across all simulations, Atlantic overturning is weak or absent, while some early Miocene simulations exhibit evidence of a Pacific Meridional Overturning Circulation (PMOC). Differences in Northern Hemisphere overturning strength and structure are strongly linked to net surface freshwater fluxes, with basins receiving greater freshwater input exhibiting weaker overturning. In all simulations, the Arctic is substantially fresher than today, and the Southern Ocean supports robust deep overturning that is comparable in strength to the modern but dominates the global MOC in the absence of strong northern overturning cells.
Relative to pre-industrial simulations, the Atlantic and South Pacific wind-driven gyres are generally weaker during the Miocene, while the North Pacific gyres are stronger. These changes are consistent with differences in wind stress curl and basin geometry. Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) transport is typically weaker than modern, consistent with weakened Southern Hemisphere westerlies.
Simulations with earlier Miocene palaeogeographies tend to exhibit westward flow through the Panama Seaway when the seaway was deeper, and the Tethys Seaway was open. These configurations are also more likely to simulate a PMOC compared to later palaeogeographies within the ensemble. With the closure of the Tethys Seaway and shoaling of the Panama Seaway in middle Miocene configurations, flow through the Panama Seaway becomes eastward, consistent with previous studies, and evidence for a PMOC disappears.
Together, these results highlight the importance of surface freshwater forcing, wind stress patterns, and evolving ocean gateways in shaping Miocene ocean circulation and underscore the transitional nature of the Miocene between earlier greenhouse climates and the modern ocean state.

How to cite: Naik, T., de Boer, A., Coxall, H., Burls, N., Bradshaw, C., Donnadieu, Y., Farnsworth, A., Frigola, A., Herold, N., Huber, M., Karami, M. P., Knorr, G., LeGrande, A., Li, Y., Lohmann, G., Lunt, D., Prange, M., and Zhang, Y.: Large-Scale Ocean Circulation During the Early and Middle Miocene: Insights from MioMIP1 Simulations, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-10949, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-10949, 2026.