EGU26-11367, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11367
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 14:15–14:25 (CEST)
 
Room 1.85/86
Optimizing a calibration strategy for precise δ13CH4 measurements of ambient air using a CRDS analyzer
Marius Feuerle, Julia B. Wietzel, and Martina Schmidt
Marius Feuerle et al.
  • Institute of Environmental Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

Methane (CH₄) is an important greenhouse gas with multiple natural and anthropogenic sources. Precise δ¹³CH₄ measurements are essential for distinguishing these sources, understanding biogeochemical cycles, and improving climate models. While in-situ CRDS (Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy) measurements may have limited absolute precision, well-calibrated continuous measurements of δ13CH4 provide high-temporal-resolution data that are essential for reliably attributing atmospheric CH4 sources.

Here, we present an instrumental characterization, determination of cross-sensitivities and an improved calibration strategy for high-precision δ13CH4 measurements in ambient air using a Picarro G2201-i CRDS analyzer. This approach combines the determination of internal correction parameters from regular measurements (every 5-6 hours) of a single calibration gas at atmospheric concentration with annual multi-point calibrations using reference gases at 10 ppm CH4 spanning an isotopic range of -60 to -37 ‰ in δ13CH4. This strategy corrects the non-linearity in δ13CH4 with changing CH4 mole fraction, which can reach up to 3 ‰ in δ13CH4 over the 2-10 ppm CH4 range.

Applying the Keeling-plot method to nightly CH₄ enhancements in Heidelberg, Germany, the new calibration leads to δ13CH4 source signatures for individual events differing up to 4.6 ‰ to the previous one-point δ-calibration. Using this new calibration scheme, the mean δ13CH4 source signature for 2021-2025 was (-52.3 ± 0.3) ‰, slightly more enriched compared to 2014-2020 ((-53.9 ± 0.3) ‰, presented by Hoheisel and Schmidt, 2024). Only a careful instrument characterization combined with an adapted calibration strategy can ensure the high precision required for δ¹³CH₄ data suitable for quantitative atmospheric studies.

How to cite: Feuerle, M., Wietzel, J. B., and Schmidt, M.: Optimizing a calibration strategy for precise δ13CH4 measurements of ambient air using a CRDS analyzer, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-11367, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11367, 2026.