EGU26-11409, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11409
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 06 May, 14:15–14:25 (CEST)
 
Room N1
When models meet data: Limits to detecting CO₂ effects in tropical forests
Sophie A. Zwartsenberg1, Jorad de Vries1, Frank J. Sterck1, Niels P.R. Anten2, and Pieter A. Zuidema1
Sophie A. Zwartsenberg et al.
  • 1Wageningen University & Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Netherlands
  • 2Wageningen University & Research, Crop Systems Analysis, Netherlands

Photosynthetic theory predicts that rising atmospheric CO₂ should enhance photosynthesis in tropical trees, potentially increasing stem growth and strengthening the tropical forest carbon sink. However, consistent positive CO₂ effects on stem growth are rarely detected in observational studies. Here, we investigate whether tree light exposure, climatic variability, and statistical limitations can explain this apparent discrepancy.

We used a previously parameterised and tested forest model to simulate tropical tree populations under fixed and rising historical CO₂ and climate representative for SE Asian lowland tropical forest. To represent realistic variation in light availability, trees were simulated in gaps of different sizes, explicitly resolving height-dependent light gradients, constraints on maximum canopy size, and dynamic changes in light conditions as trees grow. Simulations were conducted under source-limited conditions.

Across simulations, CO₂ effects on growth were weak compared to the effects of climate and light availability. The simulated CO₂ response was comparable in magnitude to effects reported in temperate forest FACE experiments, but substantially stronger than those typically inferred from tree-ring studies. CO₂ effects were amplified in cooler years but showed little sensitivity to precipitation variability.

Using the simulated data, we then evaluated whether recommended statistical approaches for the detection of CO₂ effects in tree rings could recover the CO₂ signal obtained from the model simulations. We found that, despite its relatively strong magnitude, the CO₂ effect was difficult to detect reliably. Two out of four tried methods detected a CO₂ effect, but its presence and strength were strongly dependent on the statistical model assumptions.  

These results highlight the challenges of attributing CO₂ effects on tree growth in real-world observational data, which are subject to substantial noise and may exhibit weaker responses. Progress in detecting CO₂ effects may benefit from closer integration of simulation experiments and statistical inference to guide study design and interpretation.

How to cite: Zwartsenberg, S. A., de Vries, J., Sterck, F. J., Anten, N. P. R., and Zuidema, P. A.: When models meet data: Limits to detecting CO₂ effects in tropical forests, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-11409, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11409, 2026.