EGU26-11729, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11729
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 08:40–08:50 (CEST)
 
Room L1
Comparing approaches for glacier elevation change estimation using optical DEM time series
Clare Webster1, Francesco Ioli1,2, Joaquín M.C. Belart3, Tómas Jóhannesson4, Etienne Berthier5, Enrico Mattea6, Robert McNabb7, Désirée Treichler8, Luc Girod8, Michael Zemp1, and Livia Piermattei1
Clare Webster et al.
  • 1University of Zurich, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2National Research Council of Italy, Torino, Italy
  • 3Natural Science Institute of Iceland, Akranes, Iceland
  • 4Icelandic Meteorological Office, Reykjavíik, Iceland
  • 5LEGOS, CNRS, Toulouse, France
  • 6Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
  • 7School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
  • 8Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Digital elevation models (DEMs) from optical stereo satellite imagery are widely used to quantify glacier elevation change through DEM differencing. However, incomplete spatial coverage and irregular temporal sampling limit the applicability of standard pair-wise DEM differencing over large glaciers, requiring the analysis of multi-temporal DEM time series.

Here, we compare methodological approaches for interpolating optical DEM time series to derive mean glacier elevation change rates using freely available datasets. We exploit SPOT-5 and ArcticDEM as high-resolution complements to the ASTER DEM record. Using the Hofsjökull ice cap (Iceland) as a pilot study, we assess the performance and transferability of a pixel-based Gaussian interpolation approach (Hugonnet et al., 2021) and introduce a computationally efficient elevation-band-based method. Validation is performed against independent elevation datasets, such as LiDAR and Pléiades, and through pairwise DEM differencing. 

Our results show that the elevation-band approach provides reliable estimates of glacier-elevation change under sparse, irregular sampling conditions. Furthermore, with its low computational cost and flexibility, the method is well-suited for regional applications and for extending geodetic glacier mass-balance assessments beyond the ASTER era.

 

Hugonnet, R., McNabb, R., Berthier, E., Menounos, B., Nuth, C., Girod, L., Farinotti, D., Huss, M., Dussaillant, I., Brun, F. and Kääb, A., 2021. Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century. Nature, 592(7856), pp.726-731.

How to cite: Webster, C., Ioli, F., Belart, J. M. C., Jóhannesson, T., Berthier, E., Mattea, E., McNabb, R., Treichler, D., Girod, L., Zemp, M., and Piermattei, L.: Comparing approaches for glacier elevation change estimation using optical DEM time series, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-11729, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11729, 2026.