EGU26-11739, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11739
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 14:45–14:55 (CEST)
 
Room 0.49/50
Systematic comparison of emulation techniques for regional climate under temperature overshoot scenarios
Niklas Schwind1,2, Verena Kain1, Annika Högner1,2, Alexander Nauels1,3, Zebedee Nicholls1,3,4, Assaf Shmuel1,5, Marco Zecchetto1, and Carl-Friedrich Schleussner1,2
Niklas Schwind et al.
  • 1International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Energy, Climate, and Environment (ECE), Laxenburg, Austria (schwind@iiasa.ac.at)
  • 2Geography Department, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 3School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • 4Climate Resource, Melbourne, Australia
  • 5Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA

How regional climate change evolves in overshoot scenarios, in particular after the global mean temperature (GMT) peak, is not well understood. To investigate regional changes under overshoot, we develop an emulator that predicts trends in regional climate variables at the spatial level of IPCC regions from GMT time series, with applicability both before and after overshoot.

A commonly used approach to relate regional climate change to GMT is pattern scaling, which assumes a linear relationship between GMT and regional climate variables. Previous studies indicate limitations in applying pattern scaling under post-overshoot conditions, a finding that is also reflected in results produced as part of our emulator development.

We therefore apply a range of alternative techniques to solve the regional climate trend emulation problem. These include approaches based on the existing literature, such as impulse response functions and operator approximation, as well as machine-learning-based methods, including Gaussian process regression, random forests, XGBoost, state space models, and pre-trained deep-learning-based time series prediction techniques. All methods are trained on overshoot and non-overshoot simulations from CMIP6, Flat10MIP, and additional model experiments available in the literature.

We assess the performance of each approach under overshoot scenarios and compare them with simple pattern scaling used as a baseline to assess approach performance. We introduce an evaluation framework for emulations under long-term stabilisation and overshoot pathways that accounts for whether regional climate signals are reversible or irreversible and enables robust detection of overshoot and stabilisation dynamics.

How to cite: Schwind, N., Kain, V., Högner, A., Nauels, A., Nicholls, Z., Shmuel, A., Zecchetto, M., and Schleussner, C.-F.: Systematic comparison of emulation techniques for regional climate under temperature overshoot scenarios, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-11739, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11739, 2026.