EGU26-11921, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11921
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.32
3D geological modelling with curlew and neural fields
Samuel Thiele1, Akshay Kamath1, Lachlan Grose2, Raimon Tolosana-Delgado1, Michael Hillier3, and Richard Gloaguen1
Samuel Thiele et al.
  • 1Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg, Germany (s.thiele@hzdr.de)
  • 2Monash University, School of Earth Atmosphere and Environment
  • 3Geological Survey of Canada

Implicit structural geological modelling methods can integrate various geological constraints to rapidly constrain subsurface geometries, and are widely used for resource evaluation, geotechnical and hazard assessment, and reservoir characterisation. However, established approaches based on conventional interpolators (e.g., radial basis functions or co-kriging) often suffer from interpolation artefacts (“bubbles”) and can struggle to incorporate common constraints like stratigraphic relationships (inequalities) and geophysics data. 

In this contribution we present an update on progress developing curlew, an open-source python package for structural geological modelling using neural fields (https://github.com/samthiele/curlew/). This flexible modelling framework incorporates various local constraints (value, gradient, orientation and (in)equalities) and tailored global loss functions to ensure data-consistent and geologically realistic predictions. Progressive Random Fourier Feature encodings are adopted as a tool for improving the convergence and reliability of neural fields, and drop-out based approaches to uncertainty assessment are explored. We also present a newly developed method for deriving non-interpolated (analytical) geological prototype models and illustrate how these can be used as useful priors for hyperparameter optimization and the creation of subsequent data-driven (interpolated) models. 

Finally, the applicability of these approaches to real-world data is demonstrated through several case-studies, including the Altenberg-Teplice Caldera (Germany) and Stonepark-Pallas Green region (Ireland). 

How to cite: Thiele, S., Kamath, A., Grose, L., Tolosana-Delgado, R., Hillier, M., and Gloaguen, R.: 3D geological modelling with curlew and neural fields, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-11921, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-11921, 2026.