EGU26-12156, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12156
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X3, X3.180
Responses of greenhouse gas emissions to increased precipitation events in different ecosystems
Man Zhang1,2,3, Cui Li1,2,3, Weixin Wang1,2,3, Xin Tong1,2,3, and Kaixuan Wang1,2,3
Man Zhang et al.
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
  • 2College of Soil and Water Conservation Science and Engineering (Institute of Soil and Water Conservation), Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
  • 3Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Climate change is altering precipitation patterns, which can stimulate carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling processes in terrestrial ecosystems, potentially leading to increased soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, a systematic understanding of how soil GHG fluxes respond to both increased precipitation (IP) and extreme precipitation (EP) across diverse global ecosystems is still lacking. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global meta-analysis based on data extracted from 49 published studies. Our objectives were to quantify the effects of IP and EP on fluxes of CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O, and to explore the key driving factors behind these responses. The results revealed that: (1) IP significantly enhanced soil CO₂ emissions by 10.2% and N₂O emissions by 61.7%, but had no significant effect on CH₄ fluxes. In contrast, EP significantly increased emissions of N₂O (by 61.8%), CO₂ (by 13.3%), and CH₄ (by 3.2%). (2) Ecosystem type mediated the GHG response under IP treatment (P < 0.01). Among grasslands, forests, and farmlands, the forest ecosystem showed the highest response ratios for CO₂ (30.4%), N₂O (61.8%), and soil respiration (37.5%), while grasslands exhibited the lowest responses. (3) Variation in CO₂ flux was primarily associated with soil dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon (both P < 0.001), whereas changes in N₂O flux were most strongly linked to soil NH₄⁺-N content (P < 0.001). This study synthesizes global experimental data to clarify the distinct impacts of IP and EP on GHG emissions, highlighting the critical role of ecosystem-specific traits and soil biogeochemical properties. Our findings provide an integrated perspective for predicting soil-climate feedbacks under future precipitation regimes.

How to cite: Zhang, M., Li, C., Wang, W., Tong, X., and Wang, K.: Responses of greenhouse gas emissions to increased precipitation events in different ecosystems, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-12156, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12156, 2026.