EGU26-12162, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12162
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X1, X1.63
Establishing denitrification (N2O+N2) budgets – a data driven scaling approach in grains systems
Naoya Takeda1, Taleta Bailey1, Robert Kirkby1, Lillian O'Hearn2,1, Johannes Friedl3,1, David Rowlings1, Graeme Schwenke4, Roger Armstrong2, Michael Bell5, and Peter Grace1
Naoya Takeda et al.
  • 1Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia (n3.takeda@qut.edu.au)
  • 2Grains Innovation Park, Agriculture Victoria, Horsham, VIC, Australia
  • 3Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 4New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Tamworth Agricultural Institute, Calala, NSW, Australia
  • 5School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia

Accounting for denitrification losses from agroecosystems remains challenging, particularly due to methodological challenges regarding measurements and upscaling of highly episodic nitrous oxide (N₂O) and dinitrogen (N₂) emissions to seasonal and system levels. Denitrification losses, and thus nitrogen (N) budgets remain therefore poorly constrained across a wide range of agro-ecosystems, hindering targeted development of N loss mitigation strategies. Here we present an innovative data driven upscaling approach using high-frequency N₂O datasets, and the XGBoost model, establishing seasonal N2O and N2O emissions. Emissions of N2O and N2 were measured in-situ using the 15NGF method. The XGBoost model was trained using in-situ N2O and N2 data across eight site-seasons in different grains systems in southeastern Australia, expressing the ratio of N2 to N2O emitted as a function of water-filled pore space, nitrate content and soil temperature. The trained model was then applied to additional 38 site-season-treatment high-frequency N2O datasets to estimate daily N₂ emissions, followed by aggregation to seasonal scales. Emissions N2O over the cropping season accounted for only 3.2% (on median, 2.1–4.1% at quartiles) of denitrification. Seasonal denitrification losses ranged from 2.6 to 66.1 kg N ha⁻¹ and were dominated by N2, exceeding N2O emissions by a factor of ~30 (on median, 23–46 at quartiles). Our approach delivers for the first time denitrification budgets for a range of different grains systems, providing a blueprint to investigate the effects of environmental drivers and management on denitrification. Extending this approach to other soil types and production systems offers the opportunity to derive more generic relationships between drivers and the N2O:N2 ratio as way forward to improve N budgeting for agronomic and environmental benefits.

How to cite: Takeda, N., Bailey, T., Kirkby, R., O'Hearn, L., Friedl, J., Rowlings, D., Schwenke, G., Armstrong, R., Bell, M., and Grace, P.: Establishing denitrification (N2O+N2) budgets – a data driven scaling approach in grains systems, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-12162, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12162, 2026.