EGU26-12377, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12377
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 11:00–11:10 (CEST)
 
Room -2.15
Conditions for instability in the climate–carbon cycle system
Joseph Clarke1, Chris Huntingford2, Paul Ritchie1, Rebecca Varney3, Mark Williamson1, and Peter Cox1
Joseph Clarke et al.
  • 1University of Exeter, Global Systems Institute, Mathematics, Exeter, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (j.j.clarke@exeter.ac.uk)
  • 2UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK
  • 3Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

The climate and carbon cycle interact in multiple ways. An increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere warms the climate through the greenhouse effect, but also leads to uptake of CO2 by the land and ocean sink, a negative feedback. However, the warming associated with a CO 2 increase is also expected to suppress carbon uptake, a positive feedback. This study addresses the question: “under what circumstances could the climate–carbon cycle system become unstable?” It uses both a reduced form model of the climate–carbon cycle system as well as the complex land model JULES, combined with linear stability theory, to show that: (i) the key destabilising loop involves the increase in soil respiration with temperature; (ii) the climate–carbon system can become unstable if either the climate sensitivity to CO2 or the sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature is large, and (iii) the climate–carbon system is stabilized by land and ocean carbon sinks that increase with atmospheric CO2 , with CO2-fertilization of plant photosynthesis playing a key role. For central estimates of key parameters, the critical equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) that would lead to instability at current atmospheric CO2 lies between about 11K (for large CO2 fertilization) and 6K (for no CO2 fertilization). Given the apparent stability of the climate–carbon cycle, we can view these parameter combinations as implausible. The latter value is close to the highest ECS values amongst the latest Earth Systems Models. We find that the stability of the climate–carbon system increases with atmospheric CO2 , such that the glacial CO2 concentration of 190 ppmv would be unstable even for ECS greater than around 4.5 K in the absence of CO2 fertilization of land photosynthesis.

How to cite: Clarke, J., Huntingford, C., Ritchie, P., Varney, R., Williamson, M., and Cox, P.: Conditions for instability in the climate–carbon cycle system, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-12377, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12377, 2026.