EGU26-12640, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12640
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.28
Estimating the air pollutant-attributable health burden of the oil and gas sector in Mexico using a TROPOMI flux-divergence approach
Omar Nawaz1, Karla Cervantes2, Marlene Cortez Lugo3, Horacio Riojas Rodriguez3, and Veronica Southerland4
Omar Nawaz et al.
  • 1Cardiff University, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (nawaz.muhammad@email.gwu.edu)
  • 2Independent Consultant
  • 3Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, México
  • 44. Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, DC, USA

Background: Mexico's oil and gas (O&G) sector is a source of health relevant nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions, yet the health impacts of these emissions remain unquantified. Understanding sector-specific health impacts is critical for informing methane and air quality mitigation strategies that maximize health benefits for affected communities. In this study, we conduct a full-chain health risk assessment to estimate O&G-attributable air pollution concentrations and health impacts in Mexico by leveraging satellite observations.

Methods: We derive total NOx emissions through a flux divergence calculation that applies TROPOMI remote sensing NO2 and ERA5 advection. Emissions specific to O&G were isolated through a land-use apportionment that integrates fine-resolution O&G infrastructure data from the Oil and Gas Infrastructure Mapping (OGIM) database. The GEOS-Chem High Performance (GCHP) model was used to perform a stretched-grid simulation over Mexico using these updated emissions to simulate the impact on NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations. These simulated NO2 are further downscaled using satellite-derived estimates. Population-weighted exposure was then modeled by combining downscaled pollution concentrations with municipal and AGEB-level population data.

Results: Our methodology estimates the O&G sector contributions to ambient NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations across Mexico at sub-national resolution. The integration of satellite remote sensing, chemical transport modeling, and satellite-based downscaling overcomes limitations of sparse ground monitoring and enables spatially resolved exposure assessment. We find modest improvements in normalized mean bias (NMB=-4.6%) and R2 value (R2=0.84) and increased surface-level NO2 concentrations exceeding +25% in some regions of Mexico.

Conclusions: This work demonstrates a strategy for attributing sector-specific air pollution and quantifying associated health impacts in data-limited settings. By integrating satellite observations, chemical transport modeling, and epidemiological methods, we provide evidence of the public health consequences of Mexico's O&G sector.

How to cite: Nawaz, O., Cervantes, K., Cortez Lugo, M., Riojas Rodriguez, H., and Southerland, V.: Estimating the air pollutant-attributable health burden of the oil and gas sector in Mexico using a TROPOMI flux-divergence approach, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-12640, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12640, 2026.