EGU26-12836, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12836
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 14:05–14:15 (CEST)
 
Room 1.31/32
They say “carbon!”, we say “…and nutrients!”: N-cycle biogeochemistry sustaining net productivity in a long-established temperate broadleaf forest under elevated CO2
Rob MacKenzie1, Manon Rumeau1,2, Michaela Reay1,3, Grace Handy1, Carolina Mayoral1, Anna Gardner1, Richard Norby1, Andy Smith4, Iain P. Hartley5, R. Liz Hamilton1, and Sami Ullah1
Rob MacKenzie et al.
  • 1Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (a.r.mackenzie@bham.ac.uk)
  • 2LFCR, IPRA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour - 64000 Pau
  • 3Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, UK
  • 4School of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
  • 5Geography, Faculty of Science, Environment and Economy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Enhanced ‘woody growth’ (dry matter increments, specifically), averaging 10%, has been sustained in patches of long-established (180+ years old) oak forest through 9 years of treatment with elevated CO2 (eCO2; 150 ppm above ambient). Root exudation of carbon (C) into the rhizosphere increased by 63%, which primed the microbes for nutrient acquisition to meet enhanced tree N demands. A ‘faster-tighter’ nitrogen cycle accelerates the return of nitrogen via ammonification to plant-available forms and suppresses processes such as nitrification. This ecosystem-scale N conservation strategy supports increased net productivity by maintaining the nutritional balance of the trees in the C-rich atmosphere. The faster-tighter N-cycle makes an additional 25 kg N ha-1 yr-1 available to the trees under eCO2. That is, the forest’s N-cycle adjusts to the increased C supply, but whether this capacity to adjust endures may be constrained by soil organic N stocks and anthropogenic N deposition. Further, when considering broader aspects of the forest under eCO2, we find nutritional deficiencies producing a cascade of nascent ecosystem fragility in pollen, seeds, seedlings, and food webs. The clear policy implications are: (i) that enhanced net primary productivity does not, in itself, guarantee forest resilience; (ii) that both C and N emission pathways must be accounted for when forecasting 21st-century C uptake into temperate forests; and (iii) that, when proposing forests as natural climate solutions, understanding C-nutrient interactions is of primary concern.

How to cite: MacKenzie, R., Rumeau, M., Reay, M., Handy, G., Mayoral, C., Gardner, A., Norby, R., Smith, A., Hartley, I. P., Hamilton, R. L., and Ullah, S.: They say “carbon!”, we say “…and nutrients!”: N-cycle biogeochemistry sustaining net productivity in a long-established temperate broadleaf forest under elevated CO2, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-12836, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12836, 2026.