EGU26-12919, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12919
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 06 May, 10:05–10:15 (CEST)
 
Room 1.15/16
Geosystemic signatures of the seismic preparatory phase: Insights from the 2024 Wushi and 2025 Myanmar Earthquakes
Gianfranco Cianchini1,2, Angelo De Santis1, Saioa A. Campuzano1,3, Serena D'Arcangelo1, Mariagrazia De Caro1, Martina Orlando1,4, Loredana Perrone1, Dario Sabbagh1, Maurizio Soldani1, Xuemin Zhang5, Pan Xiong5, Homayoon Alimoradi6, Habib Rahimi6, and Ariana V. Mendez3
Gianfranco Cianchini et al.
  • 1Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy (angelo.desantis@ingv.it)
  • 2IAPS-INAF Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, 00133 Rome, Italy
  • 3Università Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • 4Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy
  • 5Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, Beijing, China
  • 6University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Large recent earthquakes offer an opportunity to investigate the seismic preparatory phase from a geosystemic, multiparametric perspective, integrating lithospheric, atmospheric and ionospheric observations within the Dobrovolsky region. Using the Mw 7.1 Wushi (Xinjiang, 22 January 2024) and Mw 7.7 Myanmar (Sagaing Fault, 28 March 2025) earthquakes as natural laboratories, we jointly analyze medium‑term lithospheric signals (multi‑year) and short‑term atmospheric/ionospheric anomalies (days to months before the mainshocks). In the Wushi case, about 60 anomalies are detected: lithospheric changes persist for about one year, whereas atmospheric and ionospheric perturbations cluster within the last three months, including outgoing longwave radiation anomalies from four days before to four days after the mainshock, consistent with imminent‑stage precursors. For the Myanmar event, eleven classes of candidate precursors exhibit a characteristic sigmoid evolution in time, typical of a critical system approaching failure, and their space–time concentration supports the lithosphere–atmosphere–ionosphere coupling (LAIC) framework. A focused analysis of Swarm satellite magnetic data over the Myanmar Dobrovolsky area reveals Y‑component anomalies on 22 of 85 half‑orbits up to eight days before the earthquake; empirical magnitude estimates based on anomaly–epicentre distance yield M ≈ 7.2, in reasonable agreement with the observed M 7.7, while anomaly “energy” values cluster within a narrow range, suggesting a possible characteristic signature of seismic‑related disturbances. Overall, these case studies indicate that (i) multi‑scale, multi‑parameter anomalies often accelerate following exponential or sigmoid trends towards the mainshock, (ii) combined ground‑ and satellite‑based observations can help constrain the location of an impending event, and (iii) satellite magnetic and radiative anomalies may provide valuable input for short‑term forecasting schemes, although systematic validation on larger datasets is required before operational use.

The present work has been funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (Pianeta Dinamico - Unitary Project) and ASI (Space It Up and LIMADOU EXPO Projects).

How to cite: Cianchini, G., De Santis, A., Campuzano, S. A., D'Arcangelo, S., De Caro, M., Orlando, M., Perrone, L., Sabbagh, D., Soldani, M., Zhang, X., Xiong, P., Alimoradi, H., Rahimi, H., and Mendez, A. V.: Geosystemic signatures of the seismic preparatory phase: Insights from the 2024 Wushi and 2025 Myanmar Earthquakes, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-12919, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-12919, 2026.