EGU26-13263, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-13263
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Monday, 04 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Monday, 04 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X1, X1.25
Towards a Greener Christmas: Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Christmas Trees
Liya Zhao1 and Qi Yang2
Liya Zhao and Qi Yang
  • 1Wuhan University, School Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Agriculture water conservancy, Wuhan, China (zhaoliya921@whu.edu.cn)
  • 2Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena 07745, Germany (qiyang577@gmail.com)

In 2019, more than 26 million natural Christmas trees were purchased in the United States, with nearly twice that number sold across Europe. Each year, the majority of these trees are either landfilled or incinerated, leading to substantial methane and carbon dioxide emissions. This study explores alternatives to natural Christmas trees and evaluates climate-smart end-of-life strategies to reduce the overall carbon footprint associated with Christmas tree consumption. We first employ Google Trends data to approximate global production, consumer demand, and predominant disposal practices for both natural and artificial Christmas trees. Using these data, we construct a global map of Christmas tree-related eCO₂ emissions under different disposal scenarios, including landfilling, burning, and mulching. We introduce a “Christmas Tree Carbon Exchange Index” to quantify the disparity between carbon emissions generated during production and those occurring in consumer regions. For instance, exporting countries such as China exhibit negative index values due to their role as producers of artificial trees for international markets.
Our analysis reveals pronounced regional imbalances in carbon exchange, with major importing regions such as the European Union and the United States bearing a disproportionate net carbon burden. Life-cycle assessment results indicate that the environmental performance of a Christmas tree type is highly dependent on end-of-life management. Natural trees disposed of in landfills emit methane that, over a 10-year horizon, can exceed the cumulative emissions of an artificial tree. In contrast, mulching or chipping natural trees provides a net carbon benefit by returning biomass to the soil. We estimate that the carbon “break-even” point for an artificial tree is approximately 12 years of reuse when compared with a landfilled natural tree, but this threshold increases substantially when natural trees are mulched. Overall, achieving a genuinely greener Christmas requires shifts in both policy and consumer behavior, emphasizing the diversion of natural trees from landfills, support for local production, and long-term reuse of artificial trees.

How to cite: Zhao, L. and Yang, Q.: Towards a Greener Christmas: Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Christmas Trees, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-13263, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-13263, 2026.